The Nevada Supreme Court struck down an Uber-backed ballot initiative designed to cap contingency fees in the state’s civil cases at 20%.
Monday’s unanimous opinion found that description of the initiative’s effect was “legally insufficient.”
The Nevada Supreme Court ruled on Monday that an Uber-funded ballot initiative designed to cap contingency fees in all civil cases at 20% was "misleading and confusing."
January 27, 2025 at 04:58 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
The Nevada Supreme Court struck down an Uber-backed ballot initiative designed to cap contingency fees in the state’s civil cases at 20%.
Monday’s unanimous opinion found that description of the initiative’s effect was “legally insufficient.”
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Our client, a thriving personal injury firm known for its commitment to compassionate client care is seeking an attorney with 5+ years of ex...
McCarter and English s Chambers-ranked Government Contracts group is seeking an experienced, diligent, and proactive government contracts as...
The Court of Appeal, First Appellate District in San Francisco is accepting applications for a central staff attorney vacancy. A regular ful...