Bally Gaming Inc. may be wishing that it hadn’t taken a gamble on suing International Game Technology (IGT) for infringing a patent that covers Bally’s Wheel of Fortune slot machine. In September, Judge Edward Reed in the U.S. district court in Reno applied last year’s U.S. Supreme Court decision in KSR v. Teleflex to grant summary judgment to IGT. He declared Bally’s patent for a “motorized wheel indicator” (dial) invalid on grounds of obviousness and struck another blow against simple mechanical inventions.
“Simply utilizing a wheel or dial instead of a reel in a slot machine was not novel in the least,” Judge Reed wrote in his opinion. “The notion that a spinning object may represent the outcome of a game is as rudimentary as the children’s game Spin the Bottle.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
