Scillitani v. State

Appellant was convicted of driving while intoxicated. The Court of Appeals reversed, finding the evidence insufficient because there was no evidence of how recently the vehicle had been driven or how much time had elapsed between the accident and the arrival of law enforcement. Scillitani v. State, 297 S.W.3d 498 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 2009). The court relied on Stoutner v. State, 36 S.W.3d 716 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, pet. ref’d), and Weaver v. State, 721 S.W.2d 495 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st dist.] 1986, pet. ref’d). Id. The State filed a petition for discretionary review arguing that the evidence was sufficient.

We recently found the evidence sufficient in a DWI case with facts similar to this one. Kuciemba v. State, __ S.W.3d __, No. PD-512-09 (Tex. Crim. App. May 26, 2010). That appellate court had also relied on Stoutner and Weaver in reversing the conviction. In reversing the appellate court, we noted that “[b]eing intoxicated at the scene of a traffic accident in which the actor was a driver is some circumstantial evidence that the actor’s intoxication caused the accident.”