The Colorado Supreme Court on Monday refused to order a bookstore to tell police who bought two how-to books on making illegal drugs, saying the First Amendment and state constitution protect the right to purchase books anonymously. Police and prosecutors had argued that the buyer's identity was critical to their investigation of a methamphetamine lab and that they had no other way to prove who owned the books.
April 09, 2002 at 12:00 AM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.Com
Presented by BigVoodoo
This conference aims to help insurers and litigators better manage complex claims and litigation.
Recognizing innovation in the legal technology sector for working on precedent-setting, game-changing projects and initiatives.
Legalweek New York explores Business and Regulatory Trends, Technology and Talent drivers impacting law firms.
Mineola defense firm seeks attorneys with 3-5 years of actual insurance defense experience to handle complex general liability matters. Sala...
Pacific Law Partners, LLP Seeking Litigation Associate Attorney with 3+ years relevant experience Recognized for decades as specialists i...
U.S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGESHIP VACANCY District of New Jersey Chief Judge Michael A. Chagares of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third...