In today’s litigious environment, physicians consistently struggle with rising malpractice premiums. For those inclined to stop reading here, this article will not attempt to rehash the contentious debate over why malpractice premiums continue to rise. Rather, we want to discuss a fairly new and rapidly growing problem for physicians: personal liability for excess verdicts.
Longstanding common law holds that a tortfeasor is personally liable for any excess judgment not paid by insurance or a related statutory fund. In most instances, professionals are mandated to carry malpractice insurance. For this reason and for reasons of personal mental well-being, professionals in virtually every field, both medical and non-medical, purchase malpractice insurance to avoid just such personal liability. But what happens when the professional fails to purchase sufficient coverage? Or even worse, what happens when the insurer becomes insolvent?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]
