Going back several decades, Big Law firms that wanted to address a lack of representation in associate hiring, partner promotions and firm leadership roles targeted underrepresented groups specifically. If a scholarship, fellowship or mentorship opportunity arose with “diversity” in the title, one could safely assume it was meant to solicit applications from such underrepresented groups.

That dynamic changed last year after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down race-based affirmative action in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard. Although the case had no bearing on private employers, conservative legal advocate Edward Blum seized on growing anti-DEI sentiment and began sending threatening letters to Big Law firms that advertised diversity fellowships that specifically sought applicants from underrepresented groups.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]