While many artists fixate on the potential for generative artificial intelligence to imitate their work and infringe their copyrights, some advocates for the technology say those fears obscure the technology’s potential to unlock new forms of artistic expression and new pathways for human communication.

Those two extremes served as the foundation for a lively debate Thursday at Stanford Law School’s CodeX FutureLaw 2024.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]