Insurance Winner: Blank Rome

Describe your firm’s approach to litigation and your strategy for building successful teams for trials or other matters. We distinguish ourselves by winning efficiently. We are trial lawyers, not discovery litigators. We approach each case with a plaintiff’s mindset and advance the case toward trial. Delay postpones our client’s recovery from the insurer. We begin thinking about, and crafting, an opening statement very early in the case and continue to develop and refine the theme of our case until trial. At the same time, we treat our adversaries with the utmost civility. We have a zero-tolerance policy regarding unprofessionalism within our group. A balanced approach of zealous advocacy and civility directly corresponds to successful results for our clients.

Discuss the two biggest insurance litigation cases your firm worked on in 2019 and how you reached successful outcomes. The Diocese of New Ulm (Minnesota) filed for bankruptcy protection in 2017, facing 101 claims of sexual abuse occurring from the 1950s to the 1970s. In 2019, the diocese reached a global settlement of $34 million. Of that, Jim Murray and Jim Carter assisted the diocese in recovering $26 million from insurers. Our practice handling insurance coverage for sexual abuse liability cases is second-to-none, having recovered nearly $1 billion in insurance proceeds. Trilantic Capital Partners pursued coverage under private equity liability policies for a series of lawsuits alleging that Trilantic was responsible for the ERISA withdrawal liabilities of portfolio companies. In a challenging matter of first impression regarding liabilities that jeopardized the private equity business model, Justin Lavella and John Heintz recovered sufficient insurance to reimburse Trilantic’s defense costs and to pay a substantial portion of the underlying settlements.