Some lawyers thought they were prepared for a President Donald Trump—or at least they tried to be.

Attorneys who wanted to thwart what they viewed as the president’s potential to commit wrongdoing began holding calls about how to fend off Trump after his election win. The focus was on whether Trump would be in violation of the Constitution’s emoluments clause, a previously little known anti-corruption measure aimed at preventing sitting presidents from receiving bribes or other payments while in office.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]