Filter This View

  • October 29, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    New York Judge Approves State Street's $90 Million ERISA Settlement Despite Bank's Objections

    There will be no do-over for State Street Bank in an $89.75 million ERISA class action settlement it agreed to in June. On Wednesday, despite the bank's attempt to renege on the deal, Manhattan federa

    1 minute read

  • August 21, 2006 | The Associated Press

    Gold Kist to weigh unsolicited offer

    ATLANTA AP - The country's No. 3 chicken producer, Gold Kist, said Monday it wants to remain a stand-alone company despite buyout offers _ including one that was made public last week _ from

    1 minute read

  • Matter of Wood v Castine

    Publication Date: 2009-10-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 508073

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: October 30, 2009 508073 In the

  • July 27, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    City of New York v. DeNoble

    Judge McMahonRead the Full-Text Opinion TRAVERSE HEARING was held to de

    1 minute read

  • March 3, 2006 | The Recorder

    Letter to the Editor

    I write to castigate the office of the city attorney for its spokesperson's comments about the adjudicated attorney misconduct of Sean Connolly in the Smith case. Mike McKee's story ["a href=

    1 minute read

  • Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc. v Deutsche Inv. Mgt. Ams., Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-06-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 3195N

    Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Nardelli, Acosta, JJ. 3195N Index 650154/07 Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v Deutsche Investment Ma

  • Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (Newport Banning Ranch LLC)

    Publication Date: 2012-12-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-12-12
    Court: C.A. 4th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Shute, Mihaly & Weinberger, Rachel B. Hooper, Amy J. Bricker, and Sara A. Clark for Plaintiff and Appellant. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips and Susan K. Hori for Real Parties in Interest.
    for defendant: Office of the Attorney, City of Newport Beach, Aaron Harp and Kyle E. Rowen; Remy Moose Manley, Whitman F. Manley and Jennifer S. Holman for Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. G045622

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 13632BANNING RANCH CONSERVANCY, Plaintiff and Appellant,v.CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH et al.

  • December 14, 2009 | The Recorder

    Inyo Citizens for Better Planning v. Inyo County Board of Supervisors (Core)

    C.A. 4th E046646 The Fourth Appellate District affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment. The court held that a county erred in concluding that amendment of the definition of 

    1 minute read

  • August 16, 2011 | Daily Business Review

    Sony cuts price of PlayStation 3 by $50 to $249

    Sony Corp. is cutting the price of its PlayStation 3 gaming console by $50 in an attempt to drum up demand for the 5-year-old machine. It is now $249, down 17 percent from

    1 minute read

  • May 12, 2003 |

    News in Brief

    Private Citizens Cannot Bring ChargesPhiladelphia — Activists who have long maintained that city prosecutors turn a blind eye to police brutality have lost one of their few legal weapons

    1 minute read