Filter This View

  • December 1, 2005 | Legaltech News

    Lessons Learned from Retail

    With growing access to information, how do you find the needle in the ever-expanding haystack? Or the perfect shoe in the shoe store? Unlikely as it may seem, lawyers can learn from retailers, who tur

    1 minute read

  • Brooks v. City of San Mateo

    Publication Date: 2000-10-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-10-23
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: WOOD, KOZINSKI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John F. Prentice and Sheila A. Reid
    for defendant: Nancy E. Pritikin et al.
    Case Number: No. 98-15818

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. ORDER The opinion filed June 5, 2000, and reported at 214 F.3d 1082, is withdrawn and superseded by the attached o

  • Matter of Suker v. NYCB/DOE, 103472/12

    Publication Date: 2013-08-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge: Justice Alice Schlesinger
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 103472/12

    Cite as: Matter of Suker v. NYCB/DOE, 103472/12, NYLJ 1202616551065, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided July 25, 2013) 103472/12 Justice Alice Schlesin

  • December 13, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Following Brazil Bar Decision, Linklaters Latest International Firm to Cut Ties With Local Shop

    Formal associations between international and domestic law firms have rankled Brazilian bar officials since they started popping up in the country in the early 2000s. In the latest sign that

    1 minute read

  • May 3, 2000 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    'Tis the Season To Reward Performance

    There's nothing like a sudden, multimillion-dollar influx of cash to spark a little holiday generosity. Just ask associates and staff at Waterbury's 63-lawyer Carmody & Torrance -- one of four

    1 minute read

  • Miller v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-08-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-09
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 13
    Judge: Justice Dorsey
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NUMBER 13-99-701

    On appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.OPINIONBefore the Court En Banc *fn1Brian Lynn Miller appeals from a judgment notwithstandin

  • Treeline Garden City Plaza LLC v. Berkley-Arm Inc., 5315-05

    Publication Date: 2006-07-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-07-10
    Court: Supreme Court, Nassau County
    Judge: Leonard Austin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 5315-05

    NASSAU COUNTY Supreme Court For Plaintiff: Silverstein, Perlstein & Acampora, LLP For Defendant- Party Plaintiff: Goodman & Jacobs, LLP For

  • Matter of Hearst Corp. v. N.Y. State Police, 515693

    Publication Date: 2013-06-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
    Judge: Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Stein and Garry, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: for appellants: Jonathan Donnellan of counsel, The Hearst Corporation, New York City.
    for defendant: for respondent: Jeffrey W. Lang of counsel, Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany
    Case Number: 515693

    Cite as: Matter of Hearst Corp. v. N.Y. State Police, 515693, NYLJ 1202602373787, at *1 (App. Div., 3rd, Decided May 30, 2013)Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtin

  • Malik Corp. v. Tenacity Group, LLC

    Publication Date: 2008-12-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-12-11
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for appellant: Bernard Gray Sr., Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: Attorney for appellees: Paul Kaplan, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 07-CV-582

    Argued November 4, 2008Before KRAMER and BLACKBURNE-RIGSBY, Associate Judges, and NEBEKER, Senior Judge.Malik Corporation appeals an order granting specific performance of the sale of its apartm

  • November 23, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Family Law

    A married couple's discussion that both would need to work in order to pay for their children's college educations does not amount to a contract requiring both parties to share those bills af

    1 minute read