Filter This View

  • Alameda County Flood Control, etc. v. Department Of Water Resources

    Publication Date: 2013-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-15
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, John S. Poulos, Amy L. Pierce, Darcy L. Muilenburg; Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Greg L. Johnson; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard and Edward J. Tiedemann, for Plaintiffs and Appellants Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Zone 7, Alameda County Water District, City of Yuba City, County of Butte, County of Kings, Empire West Side Irrigation District, Kern County Water Agency, Napa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, Oak Flat Water District, Plumas County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, Santa Clara Valley Water District, Solano County Water Agency, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District. Amelia T. Minaberrigarai, for Plaintiff and Appellant Kern County Water Agency.
    for defendant: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, Denise Ferkich Hoffman, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Matthew J. Goldman and Vera Sandronsky, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent, State of California, Department of Water Resources. Bingham McCutchen LLP, James J. Dragna, Colin C. West and Thomas S. Hixson, for Defendants, Interveners and Appellants Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency, Castaic Lake Water Agency, Central Coast Water Authority, Coachella Valley Water District, Crestline-Lake Arrowhead Water Agency, Desert Water Agency, Littlerock Creek Irrigation District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Mojave Water Agency, Palmdale Water District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, and United Water Conservation District. Best Best & Krieger LLP and Robert M. Sawyer, for Defendant, Intervener and Appellant, Ventura County Watershed Protection District. Marcia L. Scully, John Schlotterbeck, Heather C. Beatty and Karen L. Tachiki for Defendant, Intervener and Appellant, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
    Case Number: No. C065522

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1904ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL, ETC. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.DEPARTMENT

  • April 9, 2001 | Law.com

    Predicted Use of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses After 'Circuit City'

    The following discussion thread excerpt is from a recently completed law.com online seminar "Current Issues Facing California Employment Attorneys" moderated by Jeffrey Tanenbaum of L

    1 minute read

  • July 9, 2007 | The Recorder

    This Week in Recorder History

    FIVE YEARS AGONew York attorney Lynne Stewart, under indictment for allegedly passing along terrorist messages on behalf of a client, delivered a lively speech to the Bay Area P

    1 minute read

  • May 27, 2004 | Legal Times

    Lawyers Giving Bush and Kerry Campaigns Cash at Record Pace

    WASHINGTON -- The pressure to raise enormous sums for the presidential campaign is on, and lawyers are delivering.Law firms and individual attorneys have poured nearly $17 million into

    1 minute read

  • October 5, 2007 | The Recorder

    How Managing Partners Manage to Survive

    Being in charge of an office full of lawyers may be about as close to thanklessness as a job gets."It's not truly a thankless job, because everybody says, 'Thank God you're doing that,'" Jon

    1 minute read

  • March 28, 2006 | Legal Times

    Top Law Firms Join Forces in Landmark Detainee Case

    When the U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments today in a landmark dispute over executive power in wartime, the Bush administration will be outnumbered -- if not outgunned. Many of the nation's

    1 minute read

  • February 5, 2007 | New York Law Journal

    Does the Future Belong To Cadwalader?

    It's bowling night at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, and even the firm's biggest names are staring down pins at Greenwich Village's Bowlmor Lanes. Mergers and acquisitions partner

    1 minute read

  • May 21, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    Washington Supreme Court Addresses "Demand Futility" in Derivative Case

    Take note, securities litigators: Washington is a "demand futility" state, according to a

    1 minute read

  • September 23, 2011 | The Recorder

    Viewpoint: BAR-ometer

    Jacqueline Nguyen Hard to believe the L.A. feder

    1 minute read

  • December 19, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    ITC Ban on HTC Smartphones Gives Apple a Win in War Against Google's Droid Software

    Apple has chosen to sue all of its major smartphone rivals at the International Trade Commission as part of its proxy war with Google. On Monday the ITC strategy paid off when the commission issu

    1 minute read