• July 24, 2009 | Law.com Corporate

    Candidates Who Passed The July 2009 NYS Bar Exam

    More than 88 percent of graduates of American Bar Association-approved law schools who sat for the first time for the July 2009 bar exam passed the test. The 88.2 percent rate i

    1 minute read

  • September 30, 2002 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection List of Ineligible Attorneys

    The Supreme Court has entered an Order declaring in le to practice law in New Jersey those attorneys not in compliance with the 2002 annual assessment. That Order and the list of in

    1 minute read

  • Fratta v. Quarterman

    Publication Date: 2008-07-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-22
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: King, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-70040

    Published opinionBefore KING, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.In this petition for writ of habeas corpus, the district court conditionally granted relief to petitioner Robert Alan Fratta, a T

  • April 14, 2004 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Pennsylvania Bar Exam Results

    The Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners has announced the results of the bar examination given on Feb. 24 and 25, 2004. Of the 689 applicants who took the examination, 355 passed (the overall

    1 minute read

  • September 26, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names of those attorneys

    1 minute read

  • Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Bureau of Land Management

    Publication Date: 2012-10-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-10-22
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: Marsha S. Berzon and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and William E. Smith, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eric. R. Glitzenstein (argued), Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C., for petitioners Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife et al. Amy R. Atwood, Center for Biological Diversity, Portland, Oregon, John T. Buse, Center for Biological Diversity, San Francisco, California, Howard M. Crystal, Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C., for petitioner Center for Biological Diversity. Adam M. Kron, Kara Gillon, Michael P. Senatore, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, D.C., for petitioner Defenders of Wildlife et al. Randolph H. Barnhouse, Samuel D. Hough (argued), Luebben Johnson & Barnhouse LLP, Los Ranchos De Albuquerque, New Mexico, for petitioner Fort Bidwell Indian Community of the Fort Bidwell Indian Reservation of California. Colette Routel (argued), Assistant Professor, William Mitchell College of Law, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for petitioner Summit Lake Paiute Tribe. Constance E. Brooks, Michael Marinovich (argued), C.E. Brooks & Associates, P.C., Denver, Colorado, for petitioner Coalition of Local Governments.
    for defendant: Nicholas A. DiMascio, Lane N. McFadden, Jennifer S. Neumann (argued), U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for respondents U.S. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. John A. Bryson (argued), John F. Clark, Holland & Hart LLP, Washington, D.C., William G. Myers III, Holland & Hart LLP, Boise, Idaho, Aaron C. Courtney, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, Oregon, Craig V. Richardson, El Paso Corporation Pipeline Group, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Thomas L. Sansonetti, Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming, Troy A. Eid, Jennifer H. Weddle, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Denver, Colorado, for respondent-intervenor Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C.

    Case Number: No. 10-72356 No. 10-72552 No. 10-72768 No. 10-72775

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 11924CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAG

  • Graham County Soil and Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. Wilson

    Publication Date: 2010-03-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-30
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 08-304

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 3906GRAHAM COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, et al., PETITIONERS v.UNITED

  • Klein v. United States

    Publication Date: 2010-07-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-07-26
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Appellant: Santiago Rodnunsky & Jones, David G. Jones and Tamara S. Fong for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Respondent: Thomas P. O?Brien, United States Attorney, Leon W. Weidman, Julie Zatz, Jonathan K. Klinck and Anoiel Khorshid, Assistant United States Attorneys, for Defendants and Respondents. Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold and Frederick D. Baker for Pacific Gas & Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company, Southern California Gas Company and San Diego Gas & Electric Company as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Randolph Cregger & Chalfant and Joseph P. Mascovich for Union Pacific Railroad Company as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

    Case Number: No. S165549

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 9376ALAN RICHARD KLEIN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al., Defendants and

  • Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Corp.

    Publication Date: 2000-01-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-01-31
    Court: Court of Appeal of the State of California
    Judge: McDONALD, WORK, HUFFMAN
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Timothy D. Cohelan, Isam C. Khoury, Margaret L. Coates, et al.
    for defendant: Ronald C. Redcay, Richard C. Morse, et al.

    Case Number: No. D030628

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.The defendants in this class action lawsuit are companies that refine oil and market gasoline to California

  • January 27, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    Luca v. County of Nassau

    Judge Frederic Block Decided: Jan. 25, 2010 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Appearances: For the Plaintiff: FREDERIC

    1 minute read