• October 1, 2004 | The American Lawyer

    The Inflation Temptation

    Like surfing the Internet during a conference call, bill padding is the sort of activity that many lawyers do, but few will admit to.In this year's Midlevel Associates Survey, however,

    1 minute read

  • January 19, 2006 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Investors' Suit Against Enron Dismissed

    PHILADELPHIA � In a suit that directly stemmed from the spectacular demise of Enron Inc., a federal appeals court has upheld the dismissal of securities claims brought by investors in a mutual

    1 minute read

  • February 5, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Firms Grow Greener as Environmental Law Heats Up

    Environmental law, which saw the same slowdown in transactional work other practices did along with decreased enforcement under the Bush administration, is showing signs of life in both lateral mov

    1 minute read

  • February 8, 2002 | Daily Business Review

    University of Miami Law School Phasing Out Night Classes

    The University of Miami School of Law is phasing out its night school, ending a half-century tradition that began after World War II when hard-working veterans were given the opportunity

    1 minute read

  • April 9, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    Panel Upsets Precedent On Attorney Malpractice

    An appeals court in Manhattan has overruled a previous precedent on legal malpractice claims, shifting the burden of proof on a threshold issue and making it easier for such claims to go forwa

    1 minute read

  • October 23, 2006 | The Recorder

    On the Move

    SAN FRANCISCOThe American College of Trial Lawyers elected five new members to its board of regents, including Robert Goodin, one of the founding partners of Goodin, M

    1 minute read

  • Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Bureau of Land Management

    Publication Date: 2012-10-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-10-22
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: Marsha S. Berzon and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and William E. Smith, District Judge.*
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Eric. R. Glitzenstein (argued), Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C., for petitioners Center for Biological Diversity and Defenders of Wildlife et al. Amy R. Atwood, Center for Biological Diversity, Portland, Oregon, John T. Buse, Center for Biological Diversity, San Francisco, California, Howard M. Crystal, Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C., for petitioner Center for Biological Diversity. Adam M. Kron, Kara Gillon, Michael P. Senatore, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, D.C., for petitioner Defenders of Wildlife et al. Randolph H. Barnhouse, Samuel D. Hough (argued), Luebben Johnson & Barnhouse LLP, Los Ranchos De Albuquerque, New Mexico, for petitioner Fort Bidwell Indian Community of the Fort Bidwell Indian Reservation of California. Colette Routel (argued), Assistant Professor, William Mitchell College of Law, Saint Paul, Minnesota, for petitioner Summit Lake Paiute Tribe. Constance E. Brooks, Michael Marinovich (argued), C.E. Brooks & Associates, P.C., Denver, Colorado, for petitioner Coalition of Local Governments.
    for defendant: Nicholas A. DiMascio, Lane N. McFadden, Jennifer S. Neumann (argued), U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, D.C., for respondents U.S. Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. John A. Bryson (argued), John F. Clark, Holland & Hart LLP, Washington, D.C., William G. Myers III, Holland & Hart LLP, Boise, Idaho, Aaron C. Courtney, Stoel Rives LLP, Portland, Oregon, Craig V. Richardson, El Paso Corporation Pipeline Group, Colorado Springs, Colorado, Thomas L. Sansonetti, Holland & Hart LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming, Troy A. Eid, Jennifer H. Weddle, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Denver, Colorado, for respondent-intervenor Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C.

    Case Number: No. 10-72356 No. 10-72552 No. 10-72768 No. 10-72775

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 11924CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAG

  • City of Alhambra v. County of Los Angeles

    Publication Date: 2012-11-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-11-19
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Colantuono & Levin, Michael G. Colantuono and Holly O. Whatley for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Jarvis, Fay, Doporto & Gibson, Benjamin P. Fay and Rick W. Jarvis for League of California Cities as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.
    for defendant: Greenberg Traurig, Scott D. Bertzyk, Karin L. Bohmholdt; Raymond G. Fortner, Jr., and Andrea Sheridan Ordin, County Counsel, and Thomas M. Tyrrell, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents. Jennifer B. Henning for California State Association of Counties as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.

    Case Number: No. S185457

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 12771CITY OF ALHAMBRA et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al.

  • December 6, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Cravath Swaine Announces Year-End Bonuses Cravath, Swaine & Moore will pay year-end bonuses ranging from $30,000 for first-year associates to $60,000 for senior assoc

    1 minute read

  • September 8, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Federal Courts Propose Rules for E-Discovery

    The federal judiciary, recognizing the challenges of litigating in a world of digital data, has published a set of proposed rules to govern the twists and turns of electronic discovery.

    1 minute read