Filter This View

  • April 6, 2016 | Daily Report Online

    DUI Defense Lawyer Didn't Want to Remain an Accountant, and Other 'On the Move' News

    When big-name DUI defense lawyers Bubba Head, Larry Kohn and Cory Yager interviewed Ryan Schwartz for a job at their firm, he'd already racked up a lot of experience—but

    1 minute read

  • April 4, 2016 | National Law Journal

    Movers: A Weekly Roundup of Laterals and Promotions

    LATERALS Greensfelder, Hemker & Gale (Chicago): Matthew Cohn joins the litigation practice group as partner and will f

    1 minute read

  • March 31, 2016 |

    7th Circuit Rejects Law Firm’s Bid for Coverage of Arbitration Award

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, affirming a decision by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, has ruled that…

    1 minute read

  • Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co. v. Smith

    Publication Date: 2016-03-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Thompson, Hugh P.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lee M. Gillis Jr., Duke R. Groover James Bates Brannangroover LLP, Macon, and Norman S. Fletcher Brinson Askew Berry Seigler Richardson Davis LLP, Rome, for appellant.
    for defendant: Amicus Appellant: Seth M. Friedman Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard Smith, Atlanta, Mark W. Wortham Hall Booth Smith PC, Columbus, and Steven E. Leder Leder Law Group, Baltimore, MD. Charles A. Childers Childers, Schlueter Smith LLP, John D. Hadden Turkheimer Hadden LLC, Jonathan W. Johnson, Atlanta, and John L. Strauss, Covington, for appellees. Amicus Appellees: David J. Hungeling, Atlanta, Michael H. Sampson Reed Smith LLP, Pittsburgh, PA, Evan T. Knott, and Emily E. Garrison Reed Smith LLP, Chicago, IL.
    Case Number: S15G1177

    The Court of Appeals erred in holding, as a matter of first impression, that personal injury claims arising from lead poisoning due to lead-based paint ingestion were not excluded from coverage purs

  • March 28, 2016 |

    Edward T. Joyce & Associates, P.C. v. Professionals Direct Ins. Co.

     Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis   Edward T. Joyce & Associates, P.C.v.Professionals Direct Ins. Co.2016 WL 1085223Only…

    1 minute read

  • Rizzo v. Applied Materials, Inc., 6:15-cv-557

    Publication Date: 2016-03-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District
    Judge: District Judge Mae D'Agostino
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff, pro se: Timothy J. Rizzo, of Counsel, Johnstown, N.Y.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant Applied Materials, Inc.: Berj K. Parseghian, Esq. Philip J. O'Rourke, Esq., of Counsel, Lewis, Brisbois Law Firm, New York, NY. Attorneys for Defendant GlobalFoundries U.S., Inc.: Eric P. Stephens, Esq., Sharyl A. Reisman, Esq., Traci L. Lovitt, Esq., of Counsel, Jones, Day Law Firm, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 6:15-cv-557

    Cite as: Rizzo v. Applie rials, Inc., 6:15-cv-557, NYLJ 1202753164516, at *1 (NDNY, Decided March 22, 2016) CASENAME Timothy J. Rizzo, Plaintiff v. Applie

  • Ardon v. City of Los Angeles

    Publication Date: 2016-03-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2016-03-17
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, Francis M. Gregorek, Rachele R. Rickert, Marisa C. Livesay; Chimicles & Tikellis, Timothy N. Mathews; Cuneo Gilbert & Laduca, Sandra W. Cuneo; Tostrud Law Group and Jon A. Tostrud for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Noreen S. Vincent and Beverly A. Cook, Assistant City Attorneys; Colantuono, Highsmith & Whatley, Michael G. Colantuono, Holly O. Whatley, Amy C. Sparrow and Tiana J. Murillo for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No: S223876

    Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 2830 ESTUARDO ARDON, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELE

  • QUAREY H., AN INFANT UNDER THE AGE OF FOURTEEN YEARS, BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN RAVEN H., plf-ap, v. GRAHAM WINDHAM, def-res, YVONNE DIXON def

    Publication Date: 2016-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
    Judge: Mazzarelli, J.P., Sweeny, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 442

    442. QUAREY H., AN INFANT UNDER THE AGE OF FOURTEEN YEARS, BY HIS MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN RAVEN H., plf-ap, v. GRAHAM WINDHAM, def-res, YVONNE DIXON def — Pollack, Pollack, Isaac &a

  • March 3, 2016 | Daily Report Online

    2015 'Was a Great Year' for Morris Manning

    Morris Manning & Martin posted another strong year in 2015, with a 7 percent revenue increase to $121.5 million that was fueled by busy transactional, real estate and real estate capital

    1 minute read

  • Donohue v. Manetti, 15-CV-636

    Publication Date: 2016-03-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Joseph Bianco
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff proceeds pro se.
    for defendant: Defendants are represented by John J. Doody, Dale Nicholson McLaren, and Suzanne Emily Aribaken, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 15-CV-636

    Cite as: Donohue v. Manetti, 15-CV-636, NYLJ 1202751139953, at *1 (EDNY, Decided February 24, 2016) CASENAME Thomas Donohue, Plaintiff v. Dr. Vincent Manetti,