• December 9, 2009 | National Law Journal

    DLA Piper to Abandon Lockstep Under New Associate Compensation Plan

    DLA Piper has released the details of a new associate compensation model that throws out lockstep in favor of a performance-based system.

    1 minute read

  • Graves v. Arpaio

    Publication Date: 2010-10-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-10-13
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Larry A. Hammond, Sharad H. Desai, and Debra A. Hill, Osborn Maledon, P.A., Phoenix, Arizona; Dan Pochoda, ACLU of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona; and Margaret Winter, ACLU ? AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Washington, D.C., for the plaintiff-appellee.
    for defendant: Michele M. Iafrate and Courtney Rachel Cloman, IAFRATE & ASSOCIATES, Phoenix, Arizona, for the defendant-appellant.

    Case Number: No. 08-17601

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 13103 FRED GRAVES and ISAAC V. POPOCA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Sheriff o

  • Kings County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-09-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Non-Jury Settlement Trl PtNelson v. Cardwell (29776/09)—Motion GrantedJustice Rachel

  • October 29, 1999 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Negligent Expert Can Be Sued for Malpractice

    An expert witness whose testimony was stricken because a mathematicalerror pointed out to him during cross-examination completely underminedhis calculation of a plaintiff's damages is not protected

    1 minute read

  • Continental Casualty Co. v. American Home Assurance Co., 05 Civ. 7874

    Publication Date: 2008-04-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-04-18
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Laura Swain
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 05 Civ. 7874

    District Judge Laura Taylor Swain U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Plaintiff's counsel: Christopher R. Carroll Carroll, McNulty &am

  • PEOPLE, ETC., res, v. ANDRE NICHOLAS, ap

    Publication Date: 2013-05-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
    Judge: Skelos, J.P.; Balkin, Cohen and Miller, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    PEOPLE, ETC., res, v. ANDRE NICHOLAS, ap — (IND. NO. 855/10)Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McGann, J.), rendered May 18, 2011, convicti

  • April 2, 2001 | The Legal Intelligencer

    At Harvard Law, They'd Rather Not Be in Philadelphia

    In his federal courts and the federal system class last Monday, Harvard Law School Professor Richard H. Fallon lectured on two landmark Supreme Court rulings arising from Pennsylvania cases --

    1 minute read

  • Price v New York City Bd. of Educ.

    Publication Date: 2008-04-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2903

    Angela M. Mazzarelli, J.P. Richard T. Andrias David B. Saxe Luis A. Gonzalez John W. Sweeny, Jr., JJ. 2903 Index 109703/06 Camella Price, et al., Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appe

  • Burke v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-11-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-01
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 2
    Judge: Lee Ann Dauphinot, Justice.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 2-98-185-CR

    FROM THE 372ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTYOPINION ON REMANDINTRODUCTIONAppellant William Burney Burke appeals from his convictions for reckless aggravated assault and intoxication assaul

  • Cohen v. Senkowski

    Publication Date: 2002-05-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-13
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Oakes, Senior Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-2362

    Argued: December 5, 2001Petitioner was convicted of sexual abuse and sought a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that his right to be present at trial had been violated when jurors were questioned