Filter This View

  • Queens County Second Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-10-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    TbaCha v. Ehmer (23102/11)—Motion WithdrawnClassic Designed Systems v. NYC School (27610/11)—Motion WithdrawnI

  • New York County First Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-11-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Eileen BranstenSciame Dev. Inc. v. Kumho Investment Bank (653515/11)—Motion Disposed As IndicatedBdcm Fund Adviser v.

  • July 2, 1999 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Philly Firm To Expand IP Practice

    Intellectual property boutique Panitch Schwarze Jacobs & Nadel announced Wednesday that it would merge into Washington, D.C. giant Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, effective Thursday.

    1 minute read

  • February 4, 2013 | Texas Lawyer

    Effectively Communicate Compliance Risk to the Board of Directors

    Fifty years ago in Washington D.C., Martin Luther King Jr. departed from his prepared remarks and delivered a speech that left an indelible mark on the American conscience. No PowerPoint, no

    1 minute read

  • December 10, 2012 | Legaltech News

    HP Working to Maintain Focus Despite Lawsuits

    Note: This story has been updated with information about additional lawsuits. In the continuing saga of Hewlett-Packard Co. and Autonomy Corp., the head of Autonomy's content

    1 minute read

  • April 25, 2011 | Texas Lawyer

    Commentary: Review of Orders Denying Arbitration

    Remember the old Wrigley Doublemint gum slogan — double your pleasure, double your fun? Well, it used to be that because of a quirk in Texas law, attorneys seeking review of orders denyin

    1 minute read

  • Larry M. Gentilello, Md v. Robert v. Rege, Md; Alfred G. Gilman, Md, Ph D

    Publication Date: 2010-12-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-01
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: King, Circuit Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-11216

    United States Court of Appeals Fifth CircuitLyle W. Cayce ClerkBefore KING, GARWOOD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.Larry M. Gentilello, M.D., a tenured professor at the University of Texas Sou

  • Cooper Technologies Co. v. Dudas

    Publication Date: 2008-08-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-19
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Linn, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For plaintiff-appellant: R. Ted Cruz, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Houston.
    for defendant: For government defendant-appellee: Nathan Kelley, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Arlington, Va. For defendant-appellee Thomas & Betts Corp.: Alan Fisch, Kaye Scholer, Washington, D.C.
    Case Number: 2008-1130

    Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges.In this case, we are called upon to determine which patents are subject to inter partes reexamination. Congress established the inter par

  • April 18, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    The FMLA, Twenty Years Later

    The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) passed in 1993 just weeks after the inauguration of President Bill Clinton. The new law provided eligible employees with 12 weeks of unpaid leave per y

    1 minute read

  • Hooker v. California Department of Transportation

    Publication Date: 2002-02-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-31
    Court: Cal.Sup.Ct.
    Judge: Brown, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. S091601

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. Filed January 31, 2002 This is the latest in a series of cases in which we have considered whether an employee of