• Dana Point Safe Harbor Collective v. Superior Court (City of Dana Point)

    Publication Date: 2010-12-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-09
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Evans, Brizendine & Silver and William D. Evans for Petitioner Dana Pont Safe Harbor Collective. Lee J. ?Petros? Petrohilos ad Christopher Glew for Petitioner The Point Alternative Care. Alison Minet Adams for Petitioner Holistic Health, Inc. Law Offices of Jacek W. Lentz, Jacek W. Lentz and Jackie-Lynn Adams for Petitioner Beach Cities Collective. Logan Retoske and Garfield Langmuir-Logan for Petitioner Dana Point Beach Collective.
    for defendant: No appearance for Respondent. Rutan & Tucker, A. Patrick Mu�oz and Jennifer Farrell for Real Party in Interest.

    Case Number: No. S180365

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15236DANA POINT SAFE HARBOR COLLECTIVE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR

  • Intelligent Digital Systems, LLC v. Beazley Ins. Co

    Publication Date: 2013-07-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Arthur D. Spatt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for the plaintiffs: David P. Rosenthal, Esq., Massapequa, NY. Attorney for the plaintiffs: Ira Levine, Esq., Great Neck, NY.
    for defendant: Attorneys for the defendant by: Christopher M. Strongosky, Esq., of Counsel, DLA Piper US LLP, New York, NY.

    Case Number: 12-CV-1209 (ADS)(GRB)

    Cite as: Intelligent Digital Systems, LLC v. Beazley Ins. Co, 12-CV-1209 (ADS)(GRB), NYLJ 1202611637922, at *1 (EDNY, Decided July 3, 2013) 12-CV-1209 (ADS)(GRB)p

  • February 25, 2002 | Corporate Counsel

    Who Owns The Earth?

    The McFaddin-Ward House, one of the plaintiffs family's original homesteads, is now a museum.E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company went to trial in Beaumont, Texas, in a poison well case with

    1 minute read

  • June 7, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Convention Controversy Draws 15 Amicus Briefs

    The New York state Legislature has submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit calling for the reversal of Eastern District Judge John Gleeson's ruling findin

    1 minute read

  • September 7, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Seeking More Than 'Market Value'

    Shadow was killed by a pellet gun. The 5-year-old shepherd-mix and his family were on vacation in Vermont, stopped at a church parking lot to take a break, according to a lawsuit filed by S

    1 minute read

  • March 15, 2010 | National Law Journal

    Credibility was at issue in 2009's largest verdict

    It was during closing arguments in a trial testing who had invented the antibody behind Abbott Laboratories' hugely successful autoimmune drug, Humira. Defense attorney Bill Lee highlighted tes

    1 minute read

  • Hildebrand v. Steck Manufacturing Company, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2002-02-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-02-07
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: Mayer, Chief Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-1087,-1195

    Appealed from: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Judge Algenon L. MarbleyDavid L. Hildebrand appeals the judgments of the United States District Court for the Southern District

  • December 13, 2006 | New York Law Journal

    Smoothing the Path From Corporate Life to Prison Life

    The lengthy sentence imposed on former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling recently is a stark reminder that the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines have made federal prison a reality for many first-time offende

    1 minute read

  • March 15, 2010 | National Law Journal

    Drug Envy

    Hamster ovaries, mare's urine, pig intestines, blood. It's not a recipe for a witch's stew — they're all components of high-tech biologic drugs. Used to treat everything from canc

    1 minute read

  • April 28, 2011 | New York Law Journal

    Using the Forum Non Conveniens Doctrine With Foreign Victims

    The forum non conveniens doctrine provides federal district courts with broad discretion to dismiss otherwise viable actions, in particular those brought by non-U.S. residents.1 In recen

    1 minute read