Filter This View

  • July 14, 1999 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    Equal Protection Clause Shines for Land Use Law

    Land use law can be seen as a great contest between the rights of the individual and the rights of society.As a result of a recent Connecticut Supreme Court decision, Thomas v. West Haven

    1 minute read

  • April 29, 2008 | Legal Times

    Supreme Court upholds Indiana voter ID law

    Just eight days before Indiana's presidential primary, the Supreme Court upheld that state's controversial voter ID law, which critics say will discourage the poor, the elderly and minorities

    1 minute read

  • July 14, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    New Jersey's New Rubric for Valuing Contaminated Property

    A recent N.J. Appellate Division ruling changes the way appraisals have traditionally been done in condemnations. Condemning authorities may now value contaminated property as if it is contami

    1 minute read

  • Embrex, Inc. v. Service Engineering Corp.

    Publication Date: 2000-07-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-06-28
    Court: Fed. Cir.
    Judge: LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: James D. Myers
    for defendant: Harvey B. Jacobson
    Case Number: No. 99-1064

    PER CURIAM.The United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina awarded Embrex, Inc. (Embrex) damages for Service Engineering Corporation's and Edward Bounds' (collectivel

  • State Office of Risk Management v. Herrera

    Publication Date: 2009-06-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-05-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 7
    Judge: James T. Campbell Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-07-0288-CV

    Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.OPINIONIn this workers' compensation case, the State Office of Risk Management (SORM)*fn1 appeals the trial cou

  • Allied Erecting & Dismantling, Co. Inc. v. USX Corporation

    Publication Date: 2001-04-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-23
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Nygaard, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 00-3064 and

    Argued September 11, 2000Filed: April 23, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTPrevious litigation between appellant, Allied Erecting and Dismantling, Co., Inc., and appellee, USX Corporation, was settled

  • July 5, 2004 | National Law Journal

    Decision summaries from The NLJ

    ANTITRUST No Sherman Act breach in insurer-pharmacy deal Rulings favoring the defense were affirmed by the 1st

    1 minute read

  • Raza v. Raza

    Publication Date: 2005-04-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Nassau County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    NASSAU COUNTY Supreme Court Justice LaMarca Requested Relief In almost simultaneous motions, CHRISTINE PARENT and JOSEPHINE PAPPALARDO, plaintiffs in Action

  • Cureton v. Philadelphia School Dist.

    Publication Date: 2002-04-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-18
    Court: Pa. Commw. Ct.
    Judge: Senior Judge Kelley
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 797 C.D. 2001,,

    Argued: March 12, 2002OPINIONIn these consolidated appeals, the School District of Philadelphia (School District) appeals and Jermaine D. Cureton, a minor by and through his parent and natural g

  • People v. Rangel

    Publication Date: 2012-06-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-14
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Ren� A. Chac�n, Supervising Deputy Attorney General and Bruce Ortega, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Theresa Osterman Stevenson, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. A132664

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 6582 THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERIK RANGEL, Defendant and Appellan