Filter This View

  • April 13, 2005 | National Law Journal

    SOX Inspires Backlash

    Hundreds of publicly traded companies finished their first, do-or-die year complying with tough new accounting and public disclosure requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

    1 minute read

  • January 9, 2003 | Daily Report Online

    Litmus test for protected speech

    Ronald K.L. Collins Why do some kinds of expression receive more constitutional protection than other kinds The short and simple answer is harm. If it can be demonstrat

    1 minute read

  • February 7, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

    All Law Firms Are Not Alike: The Top Areas Where Firms Differ

    Editor's note: first in a series. *** The irony that unfolded during two recent phone calls, which occurred within the span of an hour, was rather remarkable.

    1 minute read

  • July 28, 2005 | Legaltech News

    Five Secrets for Success in Big Cases

    You know its coming, the half-billion-dollar megatrial that may put your client out of business.It is in a location remote from your office(s), and you're going to have to support an off-si

    1 minute read

  • April 4, 2011 | New York Law Journal

    Get the Big Picture

    Law firms fail and falter. This can be easy to deny since only insiders know their firm's peccadillos. When the firm and the falter are big enough, mainstream media will report on it for all the wo

    1 minute read

  • Bilal v. New York City Department of Corrections, 08 Civ. 6664

    Publication Date: 2010-05-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-10
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Denise Cote
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08 Civ. 6664

    District Judge Denise Cote U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: For Plaintiff: Theodore Edelman, Maura Miller, C. Megan Bradley, New York,

  • December 14, 2005 | Legal Times

    30 Days to Thinner Workloads

    What activity consumes the largest amount of law department time? Contract review and preparation. Contracts -- a term I am using here to cover agreements and all other forms of legal commitme

    1 minute read

  • August 10, 2005 | National Law Journal

    Securities Class Action Trials on Rise

    In South Carolina, juries think investing in stock is like gambling and it's sinful, while in New York City, jurors are disappointed if lawyers don't rip up witnesses during questioning, but i

    1 minute read

  • Ameron International Corporation v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania

    Publication Date: 2010-11-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-18
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Stanzler Funderburk & Castellon and Jordan S. Stanzler for Plaintiff and Appellant. Weston, Benshoof, Rochefort, Rubalcava & MacCuish and Richard Giller for The California Cast Metals Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: McCurdy & Fuller, Kevin G. McGurdy and Rosemary J. Springer for Defendant and Respondent Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania. Hinshaw & Culbertson, Robert J. Romero, Paul E. Vallone and Joseph J. De Hope, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents Century Indemnity Company, Insurance Company of North America, Pacific Employers Insurance Company, St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, Harbor Insurance Company and Transcontinental Insurance Company.. Charlston, Revich & Chamberlin, Charlston, Revich & Wollitz, Ira Revich and Nicholas R. Andrea for Defendants and Respondents International Insurance Company and Puritan Insurance Company. Burnham Brown, Thomas M. Downey, Tyler G. Olpin and James Y. Higa for Defendants and Respondents Transcontinental Insurance Company and Harbor Insurance Company. Ericksen, Arbuthnot, Kilduff, Day & Lindstrom and Andrew P. Sclar for Defendant and Respondent Old Republic Insurance Company. Hogan & Hartson, David R. Singer, Jonathan S. Franklin, William J. Bowman and Catherine E. Stetson for Defendant and Respondent Twin City Fire Insurance Company. Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, Michael A. Barnes, Sonia Martin and Lee L. Kaster for Defendant and Respondent Great American Surplus Lines Insurance Company. O?Melveny & Myers, Richard B. Goetz and A. Patricia Klemic for Defendants and Respondents Insurance Company of North America and Pacific Employers Insurance Company. Foley & Lardner, Eileen R. Ridley and Patrick T. Wong for Lloyd?s and The Reinsurance Association of America as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Wiley Rein, Laura A. Foggan; Sinnott, Dito, Moura & Puebla, Randolph P. Sinnott and John J. Moura for Complex Insurance Claims Litigation Association as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents. Sinnott, Dito, Moura & Puebla, Blaise S. Curet and Stephen R. Wong for Zurich American Insurance Company as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. S153852

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 14403AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE

  • February 21, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Tea Party Ideology Likely To Be Around For a Long Time

    The failure of the Tea Party movement to rally around a single presidential candidate has convinced many pundits that its time as a major force in mainstream politics may be coming to an

    1 minute read