Filter This View

  • E-Pass Technologies, Inc. v. Moses & Singer, LLP

    Publication Date: 2010-11-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-05
    Court: C.A. 1st
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: ROSEN SABA, LLP, James R. Rosen and Adela Carrasco for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: DUANE MORRIS LLP, Richard Hoffman and Robert L. Fineman; NIXON PEABODY LLP, Isabelle L. Ord; KEKER & VAN NEST LLP, Elliot R. Peters, Wendy J. Thurm and Steven A. Hirsch for Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. A127025, A127067

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 14076E-PASS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MOSES & SINGER, LLP, et al.

  • August 31, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Criminal Law

    ALLOCATUR WATCH The state Supreme Court has agreed to decide whether a trial judge's decision to allow a deliberating jury to hear playback of audiotaped testimony outside of the defen

    1 minute read

  • July 1, 1999 | The American Lawyer

    The AmLaw 100: Firing On All Cylinders

    See The AmLaw 100 ranked by gross revenue.==============It's surprising to me, frankly, that we keep havi

    1 minute read

  • March 5, 2012 | Daily Business Review

    Successor liability can be limited before acquisition is made

    For decades, U.S. companies have struggled to manage the risk of acquiring, or merging with, a business whose prior conduct may have violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. That was true

    1 minute read

  • Tafari v. Hues

    Publication Date: 2003-02-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Judge Conner TAFARI v. HUES — Pro se plaintiff Injah E. Tafari, brings the instant action under 42 U.S.C. §1983 against defendants Corrections Officer (“C.O.

  • Adams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

    Publication Date: 2008-08-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-25
    Court: Tx. App. Dist. 5
    Judge: Amos L. Mazzant Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-06-00006-CV

    AFFIRMOPINION ON REHEARINGBefore Justices Morris, Francis, and Mazzant.We overrule appellant's motion for rehearing. We withdraw our July 31, 2007 opinion and judgment. The following is now t

  • In re Aoki v. Nootenboom, 2604/08

    Publication Date: 2012-07-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, First Department
    Judge: Before: Tom, J.P., DeGrasse, Freedman, Richter, and Román, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Keiko Ono Aoki, Respondent: Richard B. Feldman, Michael H. Smith and McKenzie A. Livingston of counsel, Rosenberg Feldman Smith, LLP, New York.
    for defendant: For Appellants: Brian P. Corrigan, Joseph P. Sullivan, Faith L. Carter and Charles F. Gibbs of counsel, Holland & Knight LLP, New York. Kana Aoki Nootenboom, et al., Respondents-Appellants, Devon Aoki, et al., Respondents.
    Case Number: 2604/08

    Cite as: In re Aoki v. Nootenboom, 2604/08, NYLJ 1202563470502, at *1 (App. Div., 1st, Decided July 17, 2012)Before: Tom, J.P., DeGrasse, Freedman, Richte

  • Brazos Transit District v. Lozano

    Publication Date: 2002-03-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-03-28
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Don Burgess Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-01-272 CV

    OPINIONThis appeal arises from a suit filed by Arturo Lozano against Brazos Transit District *fn1 (Brazos), Emmitt Davis, Jr., Christine Conn and Mary Battles for

  • The Matter of Krasner

    Publication Date: 2013-05-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Surrogate's Court, Suffolk County
    Judge: Surrogate John M. Czygier
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2012-923/B

    Cite as: The Matter of Krasner, 2012-923/B, NYLJ 1202599441365, at *1 (Surr., SUF, Decided November 27, 2012)2012-923/BSurrogate John M. Czygi

  • November 26, 2012 | National Law Journal

    Notable circuit splits on federal procedural issues

    There are circuit splits involving almost everything. There are even circuit splits about circuit splits. See, e.g., Cuellar de Osorio v. Napolitano, 2012 U.S. App. Lexis 20177 (9th Ci

    1 minute read