Filter This View

  • Venture Indus., Inc. and Int'l Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America

    Publication Date: 2000-04-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-03-31
    Court: NLRB
    Judge: FOX, LIEBMAN, and BRAME
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Case 7-CA-39190

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion.On September 19, 1997, Administrative Law JudgeGeorge Carson II issued the attached decision. The Respondent

  • August 24, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    Pre-Workout Agreements Are Today's Lender Essentials

    How can a real estate-secured lender, faced with increasing defaults by borrowers and falling property values, protect itself during borrower negotiations pursuing a restructuring, or "workout

    1 minute read

  • September 11, 2009 | New York Law Journal

    The Smoking Gun in an Adversary's Network

    As a result of the explosion in popularity of social networking Web sites such as Facebook and MySpace, where members "post" and share information about themselves as never before, attorn

    1 minute read

  • December 16, 2008 | The American Lawyer

    A moment's notice for Lehman

    By the second week of September, investors had all but given up on Lehman Brothers Holings Inc. Creditors wanted the 158-year-old investment bank to put up additional collateral to cover its

    1 minute read

  • May 1, 2007 | Daily Report Online

    High-speed case crashes in high court

    A POLICE OFFICER can terminate a high-speed chase by forcing the suspect off the road when the pursuit threatens the lives of innocent bystanders, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday in a Geo

    1 minute read

  • Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Co. v. Knudson

    Publication Date: 2002-01-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-08
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Scalia.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-1786

    534 U. S. ____ (2002)On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth CircuitThe question presented is whether �502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act

  • Alameda County Flood Control, etc. v. Department Of Water Resources

    Publication Date: 2013-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-02-15
    Court: C.A. 3rd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, John S. Poulos, Amy L. Pierce, Darcy L. Muilenburg; Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, Greg L. Johnson; Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard and Edward J. Tiedemann, for Plaintiffs and Appellants Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District Zone 7, Alameda County Water District, City of Yuba City, County of Butte, County of Kings, Empire West Side Irrigation District, Kern County Water Agency, Napa County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, Oak Flat Water District, Plumas County Flood Control & Water Conservation District, Santa Clara Valley Water District, Solano County Water Agency, and Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District. Amelia T. Minaberrigarai, for Plaintiff and Appellant Kern County Water Agency.
    for defendant: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General of California, Denise Ferkich Hoffman, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Matthew J. Goldman and Vera Sandronsky, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent, State of California, Department of Water Resources. Bingham McCutchen LLP, James J. Dragna, Colin C. West and Thomas S. Hixson, for Defendants, Interveners and Appellants Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency, Castaic Lake Water Agency, Central Coast Water Authority, Coachella Valley Water District, Crestline-Lake Arrowhead Water Agency, Desert Water Agency, Littlerock Creek Irrigation District, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, Mojave Water Agency, Palmdale Water District, San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District, San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District, San Gorgonio Pass Water Agency, and United Water Conservation District. Best Best & Krieger LLP and Robert M. Sawyer, for Defendant, Intervener and Appellant, Ventura County Watershed Protection District. Marcia L. Scully, John Schlotterbeck, Heather C. Beatty and Karen L. Tachiki for Defendant, Intervener and Appellant, The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
    Case Number: No. C065522

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1904ALAMEDA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL, ETC. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,v.DEPARTMENT

  • Woods v. Rondout Valley Central School District Board of Education, 05-1080-cv

    Publication Date: 2006-10-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-10-10
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Reena Raggi
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-1080-cv

    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT MARK C. RUSHFIELD, Shaw and Perelson, LLP, for Defendants-Appellants. STEPHEN BERGSTEIN, Thornton, Bergstein & Ullrich, LLP, Chester, f

  • Messerschmidt v. Millender

    Publication Date: 2012-02-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-02-22
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 10–704

      CURT MESSERSCHMIDT, et al., PETITIONERS v. BRENDA MILLENDER, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF AU

  • March 15, 2010 | New York Law Journal

    Alexander v. Cahill

    Judges Walker and Calabresi1 Decided: March 12; 07-3677-cv Defendants below, representing New York's Appellate Division, appeal from the decision of the United States Distr

    1 minute read