• People v. Michael Spicola, No. 60

    Publication Date: 2011-04-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: New York State Court of Appeals
    Judge: Opinion by Judge Read. Judges Graffeo, Smith and Pigott concur. Chief Judge Lippman dissents and votes to reverse in an opinionin which Judges Ciparick and Jones concur.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul J. Cambria, for appellant.
    for defendant: Shawn P. Hennessy, for respondent.

    Case Number: No. 60

    Cite as: People v. Michael Spicola, Index 60, NYLJ 1202488754790, at *1 (Ct. of App., Decided March 31, 2011)Opinion by Judge Read. Judges Graffeo, Smith and Pi

  • Alexander v. Cahill

    Publication Date: 2010-04-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-12
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Calabresi, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Docket Nos. 07-3677-cv (L), 07-3900-cv (XAP)

    Argued: January 22, 2009Before: WALKER and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.*fn1New York's Appellate Division adopted new rules prohibiting certain types of attorney a

  • July 16, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    Conroy v. New York State Department of Correctional Services

    Decided June 18, 2003 Before Cabranes, Pooler and Katzman, C.JJ.Appeal from the March 11, 2002, judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Caro

    Publication Date: 2010-03-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-17
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Duncan, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-5

    PUBLISHEDArgued: October 30, 2009Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Duncan wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge Shedd concurred. Judg

  • Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-09-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-09-08
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Steven M. Watt, Ben Wizner (argued), Jameel Jaffer and Steven R. Shapiro, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, New York; Ann Brick and Julia Harumi Mass, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Northern California, San Francisco, California; Paul Hoffman, Schonbrun DeSimone Seplow Harris & Hoffman LLP, Venice, California; Hope Metcalf, National Litigation Project, Allard K. Lowenstein International Human Rights Clinic, Yale Law School, New Haven, Connecticut, for the plaintiffs-appellants. Clive Stafford-Smith and Zachary KatzNelson, Reprieve, London, England, for plaintiff-appellant Binyam Mohamed. Margaret L. Satterthwaite and Amna Akbar, International Human Rights Clinic, Washington Square Legal Services, Inc., New York, New York, for plaintiff-appellant Mohamed Farag Ahmad Bashmilah.
    for defendant: Daniel P. Collins (argued), Paul J. Watford, Mark R. Yohalem and Henry Weissmann, Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee Jeppesen Dataplan, Inc. Ian Heath Gershengorn, Michael F. Hertz, Joseph P. Russoniello, Douglas N. Letter (argued), Sharon Swingle and Michael P. Abate, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for intervenor-appellee United States of America. Gary Bostwick and Jean-Paul Jassy, Bostwick & Jassy LLP, Los Angeles, California, for amici curiae Professors William G. Weaver and Robert M. Pallitto. Barbara Moses and David J. Stankiewicz, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason, Anello & Bohrer, P.C., New York, New York; Aziz Huq and Jonathan Hafetz, Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, New York, New York, for amici curiae former United States diplomats. Wiliam J. Aceves, California Western School of Law, San Diego, California; Gerald Staberock and Carlos Lopez, International Commission of Jurists, Geneva, Switzerland; Carla Ferstman, Lorna McGregor and Lucy Moxham, REDRESS, London, United Kingdom; Denna R. Hurwitz, Human Rights Program, University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia, for amici curiae REDRESS and the International Commission of Jurists. Stephen I. Vladeck, American University Washington College of Law, Washington, D.C.; Natalie L. Bridgeman, Law Offices of Natalie L. Bridgeman, San Francisco, California, for amici curiae professors of constitutional law, federal jurisdiction and foreign relations law. Andrew G. McBride, Thomas R. McCarthy and Stephen J. Obermeier, Wiley Rein LLP, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. Daniel J. Popeo and Richard A. Samp, Washington Legal Foundation, Washington, D.C., for amici curiae Washington Legal Foundation and Allied Educational Foundation. Richard R. Wiebe, Law Office of Richard R. Wiebe, San Francisco, California; Cindy A. Cohn, Lee Tien, Kurt Opsahl, Kevin S. Bankston, Corynne Mcherry and James S. Tyre, Electronic Frontier Foundation, San Francisco, California, for amicus curiae Electronic Frontier Foundation. James M. Ringer, Clifford Chance US LLP, New York, New York, for amici curiae Commonwealth Lawyers Association and JUSTICE.

    Case Number: No. 08-15693

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 11814 BINYAM MOHAMED; ABOU ELKASSIM BRITEL; AHMED AGIZA; MOHAMED FARAG AHMAD BASHMILAH; BISHER AL-RAWI, Plaintiffs-Appellants, p class=

  • Leos v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2013-06-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-04
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kesluk & Silverstein, Douglas N. Silverstein, Lauren J. Morrison; The Rubin Law Corporation and Steven M. Rubin for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
    for defendant: Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, Beth A. Gunn and Jennifer L. Katz for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. B241630

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 6606 ALEXIS LEOS et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. DARDEN RES

  • January 1, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Topical Index to State Case Digests

    ADMINISTRATIVE LAW � Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission Infinity Outdoor, Inc. v. Delaware and Raritan Canal Commission , A-0111-04T3; Appellate Division; opin

    1 minute read

  • Tavares v. Amato, 12-CV-563

    Publication Date: 2013-06-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Northern District
    Judge: Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 12-CV-563

    Cite as: Tavares v. Amato, 12-CV-563, NYLJ 1202607125803, at *1 (NDNY, Decided May 14, 2013) 12-CV-563 Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummelp

  • Exxon Corporation and Exxon Texas, Inc v. Emerald Oil & Gas Company, L.C. and Laurie T. Miesch, Et Al.

    Publication Date: 2010-12-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-17
    Court: Tx. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Dale Wainwright Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 05-1076

    Argued February 13, 2007Rehearing Granted November 20, 2009 JUSTICE WAINWRIGHT delivered the opinion of the Court. JUSTICE GUZMAN and JUSTICE LEHRMANN did not participate in the decision. After

  • United States of America v. Efrain Gonzalez, Jr

    Publication Date: 2011-08-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-07-22
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Kearse, Circuit Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 10-2202-cr

    10-2202-crUSA v. GonzalezArgued: April 11, 2011Before: KEARSE, MINER, and CHIN, Circuit Judges.Conviction and custodial sentence affirmed; restitution order vacated and remanded for