Filter This View

  • Ross H. Mandell, Petitioner v. Nicholas S. Reeve, Individually and on Behalf of Prostar 2000, Respondents, 10 Civ. 6530 (RJS)

    Publication Date: 2011-11-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Richard J. Sullivan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Ross H. Mandell is represented by Jeffrey C. Hoffman, Lisa R. Rosenthal, and William A. Rome of Hoffman & Pollock LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: Nicholas S. Reeve and Prostar 2000 are represented by Nicholas J. Guiliano of Guiliano Law Firm, P.C., Philadelphia, PA. *1
    Case Number: 10 Civ. 6530 (RJS)

    Cite as: Mandell v. Reeve, 10 Civ. 6530 (RJS), NYLJ 1202520956432, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 4, 2011)District Judge Richard J. Sullivanp class="de

  • St. Luke's Cataract and Laser Institute v. Sanderson

    Publication Date: 2009-07-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-07-09
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Hull, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-11848

    PUBLISHBefore CARNES, HULL and COX, Circuit Judges.This appeal arises out of an intellectual property dispute between Plaintiff St. Luke's Cataract and Laser Institute, P.C. ("St. Luke's") and D

  • Wilson v. Workman

    Publication Date: 2009-09-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-08-27
    Court: 10th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 06-5179, 07-7034 and 07-7056

    PUBLISHBefore HENRY, Chief Judge, TACHA, KELLY, BRISCOE, LUCERO, MURPHY, HARTZ, O'BRIEN, McCONNELL, TYMKOVICH, GORSUCH, and HOLMES, Circuit Judges.McCONNELL, Circuit Judge, joined by HENRY, Chie

  • May 17, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Prince v. Cablevision Systems Corp.

    Judge SweetRead the Full-Text Opinion Defendants Cablevision Systems Corporation ("C

    1 minute read

  • May 11, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    United States v. Wayne Gaskin

    Decided April 16, 2004Before Feinberg, Kearse and Raggi, C.JJ. Appeal from amended judgments of conviction entered in the United States District Court for the Western District of

    1 minute read

  • People v. Xinos

    Publication Date: 2011-02-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-08
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Respondent: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gerald A. Engler, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Stan Helfman, Masha A. Dabiza and Jeffrey Laurence, Deputy Attorneys General
    for defendant: Attorneys for Appellant: Riordan & Horgan, Dennis P. Riordan, Donald M. Horgan and Layli Shirani
    Case Number: No. H034305

    Cite as 11 C.D.O.S. 1828THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GEORGE CONSTANTINE XINOS, Defendant and Appell

  • Royston, Rayzor, Vickery & Williams, L.L.P. v. Lopez

    Publication Date: 2013-07-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-06-27
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 13
    Judge: GINAM. BENAVIDES, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 13-11-00757-CV, 13-12-00023-CV

    On appeal from the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Before Chi

  • United States v. Upton

    Publication Date: 2009-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-03-05
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Howard, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 05-1593

    Before Lynch, Chief Judge, Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges.A jury convicted George Upton of conspiracy to commit money laundering. In this appeal, he argues that, by the time of his indictment, th

  • In re Boyette

    Publication Date: 2013-05-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-05-30
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Bill Lockyer, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Robert R. Anderson and Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorneys General, Ronald A. Bass and Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorneys General, Ronald S. Matthias, Glenn R. Pruden and Christina Vom Saal, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent State of California.
    for defendant: Lynne S. Coffin, under appointment by the Supreme Court, Lynne S. Coffin, State Public Defender, Audrey Chavez and Gail Johnson, Deputy State Public Defenders, for Petitioner Maurice Boyette.
    Case Number: No. S092356

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 5410In re MAURICE BOYETTE on Habeas Corpus. No. S092356In the Supreme Court

  • Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2000-10-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-10-05
    Court: Cal. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: BAXTER, J., GEORGE, C.J., MOSK, J., WERDEGAR, J., CHIN, J., BROWN, J., and KENNARD, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. S062201

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. This case presents questions about the law governing claims of wrongful discharge from employment, as it applies to