• Association of Public Agency Customers v. Bonneville Power Administration

    Publication Date: 2013-10-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-10-28
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Before: Arthur L. Alarcón, Stephen S. Trott, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kathleen M. Sullivan (argued), Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, New York; Michael Alcantar and Donald Brookhyser, Alcantar & Kahl, LLP, Portland, Oregon; Michael N. Kunselman, Alston & Bird, LLP, Washington, D.C.; John M. Rochefort, Alston & Bird, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Judith Endejan, Graham & Dunn, PC, Seattle, Washington; Jason N. Poulos, Weinberg Wheeler Hudgins Gunn & Dial, Atlanta, Georgia, for Petitioner.
    for defendant: Kurt R. Casad (argued), Special Assistant United States Attorney, S. Amanda Marshall, United States Attorney, Stephen J. Odell, Assistant United States Attorney, Richard A. Greene, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon; Randy A. Roach and Timothy A. Johnson, Bonneville Power Administration, Portland, Oregon, for Respondent.

    Case Number: No. 11-73178

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 11791 ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AGENCY CUSTOMERS, Petitioner, v. BONNEVI

  • October 28, 2013 | New York Law Journal

    Pro Bono Work Recognized

    The 2013 Jeremy G. Epstein Awards for Outstanding Pro Bono Service, honoring City Bar Justic

    1 minute read

  • October 9, 2013 |

    A Suit Too Soon: 11th Circuit Finds Insured’s Action Seeking to Stem Subrogration Was Not Yet Justiciable

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has ruled that an insured’s declaratory judgment action seeking to protect the proceeds of a settlement…

    1 minute read

  • September 30, 2013 | National Law Journal

    Edging Akin Gump, Patton Boggs Claims Top Slot

    For the first time since 2007, Washington has a new leader in lobbying revenue. With $106.3 million in government-affairs income during 2012, Patton Boggs has knocked Akin Gump Strauss Hauer

    1 minute read

  • August 4, 2013 |

    European Commission proposal would enable more private antitrust claims across EU

    In the U.S., private antitrust enforcement plays a large role in the general enforcement scheme of the antitrust laws.

    1 minute read

  • HWA Props. Inc. v. Community & S. Bank

    Publication Date: 2013-08-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Ellington, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Matthew Brooks Troutman Sanders LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . Bret Thrasher and Aaron Kappler Thompson, O'Brien, Kemp & Nasuti PC, Norcross, for appellee.

    Case Number: A13A0047

    The bank was not entitled to a deficiency judgment on the note as it failed to comply with the confirmation requirements of O.C.G.A. § 44-1

  • Brooks Peanut Co. Inc. v. Great S. Peanut LLC

    Publication Date: 2013-07-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Ellington, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nowell Berreth Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, and R. Edgar Campbell Perry & Walters, Albany, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles Peeler Flynn Peeler & Phillips LLC, Albany, for appellee.

    Case Number: A13A0633

    A broker's written confirmation of a commodities transaction was sufficient to satisfy the Statute of F

  • July 17, 2013 | The American Lawyer

    Faculty Group Demands Wachtell's Lipton Quit NYU Post

    A group of New York University professors angry over president John Sexton's stewardship of the school is calling on one of Sexton's chief defenders, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Ka

    1 minute read

  • State v. Al-Khayyal

    Publication Date: 2013-06-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Ellington, John J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Laura Pfister, and Nels Peterson Georgia Department of Law, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Michael Brown and Angela Adams Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.

    Case Number: A13A0623

    The evidence did not establish that the technology professor had no knowledge of the presence of certain files containing sexually explicit images of young girls in his computer's trash folder while

  • Murtagh v. Emory Univ.

    Publication Date: 2013-04-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Branch, Elizabeth
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lauren Goodhart Goodhart Law Firm, Jami Kohn Weinstock & Scavo PC, and Mark Spix, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Todd Wozniak, Lindsey Edelmann Greenberg Traurig LLP, and Theodore Eichelberger Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, for appellees.

    Case Number: A12A2127

    The trial court erred in its imposition of a $15K fine, since it constituted an adjudication of criminal contempt in excess of $500 per act authorized under O.C.G.A. § 15-6-8 subsect