Filter This View

  • December 2, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    In Patent Battle Over Nook, Barnes & Noble Bolsters Legal Team

    As Barnes & Noble defends itself against accusations that its Nook infringes Microsoft's patents, the bookstore chain brought in a lawyer experienced in the tech giant's ways: David

    1 minute read

  • December 2, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    In Patent Battle Over Nook, Barnes & Noble Bolsters Legal Team

    As Barnes & Noble defends itself against accusations that its Nook infringes Microsoft's patents, the bookstore chain brought in a lawyer experienced in the tech giant's ways: David

    1 minute read

  • December 2, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    In Patent Battle Over Nook, Barnes & Noble Bolsters Legal Team

    As Barnes & Noble defends itself against accusations that its Nook infringes Microsoft's patents, the bookstore chain brought in a lawyer experienced in the tech giant's ways: David

    1 minute read

  • November 30, 2011 | Law.com Corporate

    In Battle over Nook, Barnes & Noble Adds Boies to a Team Stacked with Lawyers from Cravath, Quinn, and Kenyon

    In a case before the International Trade Commission, Microsoft is trying to ban importation of Barnes & Noble's Nook, claiming that it infringes five of its patents. B&N has struck back by

    1 minute read

  • Lewis v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-11-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael L. Brown, Bernard Taylor Alston & Bird, and Angela Adams, Atlanta, for appellant. Robert D. James Jr., District Attorney, John S. Melvin, Deputy Chief Assistant District Attorney, Deborah D. Wellborn, Michael S. Carlson, Assistant District Attorneys, Decatur, and Rhani M. Lott Hunton & Williams LLP, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: Brenda J. Bernstein The Bernstein Firm PC, Charles T. Brant, Atlanta, and John H. Petrey, Decatur.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A11A0859

    The trial court abused its discretion in disqualifying an attorney and law firm from continued representation of the defendant in a criminal matter because the firm also represented the employer of

  • Farm Credit of Northwest Fla. ACA v. Easom Peanut Co.

    Publication Date: 2011-11-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: McFadden, Christopher J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nowell D. Berreth, Lisa R. Bugni and Todd R. David Alston & Bird, Atlanta, for appellant. Christina L. Folsom, William P. Langdale Jr. Langdale & Vallotton LLP, Valdosta, David A. Kendrick Floyd & Kendrick LLC, Bainbridge, Patrick S. Flynn, Albany, C. Edwin Rude Jr., Tallahassee, Fla., and Ernest A. Sellers Jr., Gainesville, Fla., for appellees.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A11A0816

    The trial court erroneously found that the peanut growers' reserved security interest in peanut crops had priority over the lending association's security interest until such time as the peanut brok

  • Fundus America Atlanta Ltd. Partnership v. RHOC Consolidation LLC

    Publication Date: 2011-11-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John C. Weitnauer, William C. Massey, Candace N. Smith, Meaghan G. Boyd Alston & Bird, Richard L. Robbins, Alexa R. Ross, and Jason Alloy RobbinsFreed, Atlanta, for appellant. Michael B. Terry, Timothy S. Rigsbee, and Ronan P. Doherty Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Atlanta, for appellees.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A11A1496

    A lease assignment agreement incorporating an estoppel certificate and containing an integration clause foreclosed the landlord's breach of contract claims, as a party can agree to be estopped under

  • First Media Group Inc. v. Doe

    Publication Date: 2011-10-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Dillard, Stephen Louis A.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: David H. Flint, Mark W. Forsling Schreeder Wheeler & Flint LLP, and Jay D. Bennett Alston & Bird, Atlanta, for appellant. Lance A. Cooper, Marietta, and Robert K. Finnell, Rome, for appellee.
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A11A1248

    Because the p ff did not have actual notice of the trial court's intended disposition of the defendant's summary judgment motion, she was entitled to voluntarily dismiss her comp

  • October 3, 2011 |

    5 key components of a social media policy

    How to create clear rules for employees about online postings.

    1 minute read

  • October 3, 2011 |

    Employer gets partial victory under CFAA

    6th Circuit says union's denial-of-service campaign was illegal under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

    1 minute read