Don’t forget you can visit MyAlerts to manage your alerts at any time.
6,369 results for 'Alston & Bird/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////' You can use Search Constraints to get even better search results
Publication Date: 2011-09-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: McFadden, Christopher J.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Nowell D. Berreth, Lisa R. Bugni and Todd R. David Alston & Bird, Atlanta, for appellant. Christina L. Folsom, William P. Langdale Jr. Langdale & Vallotton LLP, Valdosta, David A. Kendrick Floyd & Kendrick LLC, Bainbridge, Patrick S. Flynn, Albany, C. Edwin Rude Jr., Tallahassee, Fla. and Ernest A. Sellers Jr., Gainesville, Fla., for appellees.
for defendant:
Case Number: A11A0816
The trial court erroneously found that the peanut growers' reserved security interest in peanut crops had priority over the lending association's security interest until such time as the peanut brok
September 16, 2011 | The American Lawyer
DAVID BURTON joined Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld as a partner in New York in the tax and project finance and rene
1 minute read
Publication Date: 2011-08-19
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Hugh B. McNatt McNatt Greene & Peterson, Vidalia, and Natalie M. Beasmen, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: . Michael D. McRae and Jason B. Sanker McRae, Stegal, Peek, Harman, Smith & Manning, Cedartown, for appellees. Other party representation: Steven T. Minor Tisinger, Tisinger, Vance & Greer, Carrollton, Charles T. Autry, Roland F. Hall Autry Horton & Cole LLP, Tucker, Peter M. Degnan and Jonathan E. Wells Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta.
Case Number: A09A2015
Because the noise emanating from the exhaust stacks resulted from the essential method of the power plant's operation, the neighbors were limited to filing one cause of action for the recovery of p
Publication Date: 2011-08-05
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: James E. Ellison Burnside, Wall, Daniel & Ellison, Augusta, for appellant.
for defendant: Richard W. Hendrix Finch McCranie LLP, Atlanta, and Randolph Frails, Augusta, for appellees.
Case Number: A11A0672
The case was remanded for the trial court to address cause in fact, since the county sheriff properly raised the question of whether a driver, who was fleeing a traffic stop, might still have caused
Publication Date: 2011-07-22
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Miller, M. Yvette
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Warren R. Calvert, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Lourdes Gonzalez, Assistant Attorney General, Atlanta, for appellant.
for defendant: Robert G. Brazier and Michael S. Evans Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz PC, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: Timothy J. Peaden Alston & Bird, Atlanta.
Case Number: A08A2323
The gain from a sale of one company to another was excluded from Georgia taxable income, because O.C.G.A. § 48-7-21 applies only to elections made by corporate tax payers and the § 338 h 10 electio
Publication Date: 2011-06-24
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Nahmias, David E.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Natalie M. C. Beasman Balch & Bingham LLP, placeCityAtlantaGregory M. Cole Autry, Horton & Cole LLP, Tucker, and Hugh B. McNatt McNatt, Greene & Peterson, Vidalia, for appellants. Jason B. Sanker, Michael D. McRae and Robert T. Monroe McRae, Stegall, Peek, Harman, Smith & Manning LLP, Cedartown, for appellees. Amicus appellants: Charles T. Autry, Roland F. L. Hall Autry, Horton & Cole, Tucker, Kristin H. Dial, Steven T. Minor Tisinger Vance PC, CityCarrolltonPeter M. Degnan and Jonathan E. Wells Alston & Bird LLP, placeCityAtlanta
for defendant:
Case Number: S10G1244
Because the noise emanating from the exhaust stacks resulted from the essential method of the power plant's operation, the neighbors were limited to filing one cause of action for the recovery of p
Publication Date: 2011-03-18
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Andrews, Gary Blaylock
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Lindsay R. Jones, Decatur, for appellant.
for defendant: Bernard Taylor and Sean A. Simmons Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case Number: A10A1869
The plaintiffs failed to state a claim that a hospital violated a duty of care not to wrongfully abandon the medical tre it provided them because their complaint failed to allege that their tr
Publication Date: 2011-02-18
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Travis C. Hargrove and Kirsten C. Stevenson Page, Scrantom, Sprouse, Tucker & Ford PC, Columbus, for appellant.
for defendant: Mary T. Benton and Timothy J. Peaden Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case Number: A10A1856
The freeport exemption did not apply to a company's inventory in Georgia because the company was not holding the inventory for final shipment outside of the
Publication Date: 2011-02-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Benham, Robert
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Robert L. Allgood Enterprise Mill, David E. Hudson and Christopher A. Cosper Hull, Towill, Norman, Barrett & Salley PC, Augusta, for appellant.
for defendant: Michael C. Kendall Talley, French & Kendall PC, Douglasville, Sam G. Nicholson, Harry D. Revell Nicholson Revell LLP, David B. Bell, Bell & Bell Assocs., John C. Bell Jr. and Pamela S. James Bell & Brigham, Augusta, for appellees. Amicus Appellant: Donna P. Bergson Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta. Amicus Appellee: John D. Hadden Turkheimer & Hadden LLC, Atlanta, and Jason L. Crawford Daughtery, Crawford, Fuller & Brown LLP, Columbus.
Case Number: S10G1142
The statutory and regulatory scheme governing TRICARE does not provide any basis for allowing contracting civilian healthcare providers to collect their treatment costs from a third-party tortfeasor/
Publication Date: 2011-01-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Travis C. Hargrove and Kirsten C. Stevenson Page, Scrantom, Sprouse, Tucker & Ford, Columbus, for appellant.
for defendant: Mary T. Benton and Timothy J. Peaden Alston & Bird, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case Number: A10A1856
The freeport exemption did not apply to a company's inventory in Georgia because the company was not holding the inventory for final shipment outside of the
Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.
