Filter This View

  • January 19, 2006 | The Corporate Counselor

    What Every Corporate Counsel Should Know About Non-Compete Agreements

    Successful businesses want to protect their proprietary information, whether it is a "secret ingredient" or a customer list. Many companies seek to achieve this goal by requiring that all employees

    1 minute read

  • Xiao Yang Chen v. Fischer

    Publication Date: 2004-11-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    APPEAL by the plaintiff, in an action to recover damages for intentional infliction of emotional distress and personal injuries, from an order of the Supreme Court (Aldo A. Nastasi, J.), entered De

  • Hayden v. County of Nassau

    Publication Date: 1999-06-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-06-09
    Court: United States Court of Appeals for The Second Circuit
    Judge: OAKES, WALKER and KEITH, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: MARTIN S. KAUFMAN, Esq.
    for defendant: CHARLES D. CUNNINGHAM, Esq., and ROBIN L. ALPERSTEIN, Esq.
    Case Number: No. 98-6113

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. Appeal from a district court decision which dismissed a class action suit brought by 68 applicants to the N

  • District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn MCCORKLE v. PATERSON, 1:08-CV-1130, Decided 01/07/10"

    Publication Date: 2010-01-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn MCCORKLE v. PATERSON, 1:08-CV-1130, Decided 01/07/10" MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Cyrus Mc

  • Champion Mortgage v. Knight, 2006-01317

    Publication Date: 2007-08-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge: Jeffrey Spinner
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2006-01317

    Justice Jeffrey Arlen Spinner SUFFOKD COUNTY Supreme Court Attorney for plaintiff: Owen M. Robinson Esq. Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates P.C. Atto

  • Basardh v. Gates

    Publication Date: 2008-11-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-11-04
    Court: DC Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for respondent: Gregory Katsas, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.
    for defendant: Attorney for petitioner: Steven Wax, Office of the Public Defender for the District of Oregon, Portland, Ore.
    Case Number: 07-1192

    On Motion to Hold Case in Abeyance or, in the alternative, Dismiss Without PrejudiceBefore: HENDERSON, RANDOLPH, and BROWN, Circuit Judges.The government has moved to hold in abeyance Yasin Muha

  • Matter of Magidson v Strategic Telemarketing, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-02-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 506253

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: February 18, 2010 506253 In the

  • Burnet Central Appraisal District v. Millmeyer

    Publication Date: 2009-04-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-04-02
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 03-05-00018-CV

    OPINIONThis is an ad valorem tax case concerning the value of a piece of residential property. Burnet Central Appraisal District (the "Appraisal District") appeals from a district court judgment th

  • October 9, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    For Investors' Sake, Keep SLUSA Simple

    Summary Judgment is American Lawyer senior writer Susan Beck's regular opinion column for the

    1 minute read

  • Karas v. Katten Muchin Zavis Rosenman

    Publication Date: 2006-01-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Stein This action involves a dispute over the interpretation and validity of an agreement between a patent lawy