Filter This View

  • February 8, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Shareholders Challenge Bylaws Limiting M&A Suits to Del. Chancery Court

    Kessler, Topaz, Meltzer & Check and Prickett, Jones & Elliott set a record in the Delaware Court of Chancery less than two months ago when they won a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/tal

    1 minute read

  • Pritchard v. County of Erie, 04-CV-00534C

    Publication Date: 2007-11-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2007-10-31
    Court: Unknown
    Judge: John Curtin
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 04-CV-00534C

    District Judge John T. Curtin U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Judge Curtin On June 12, 2007, this court issued an order denying plaintiffs'

  • People v. Johnson, 2009QN068173

    Publication Date: 2010-07-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-24
    Court: Criminal Court, Queens County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2009QN068173

    Judge Elisa S. Koenderman QUEENS COUNTY Criminal Court Attorney for defendant: Michael Horn Queens Law Associates Attorney for the People: ADA Jonathan Sel

  • Taita Chemical Co., Ltd. v. Westlake Styrene Corp.

    Publication Date: 2001-03-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-03-23
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Samuel B. Kent, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00-30020

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of LouisianaPlaintiff-Counter Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee, Taita Chemical Co., Ltd. ("Taita"), appeals the District Cour

  • Green v. Harris Publications

    Publication Date: 2004-08-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Judge Chin In this employment discrimination case, plaintiff Bobby Leepiei Green alleges that defendants Harris Publi

  • Financial Network Investment Corporation v. Becker

    Publication Date: 2003-05-08
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 1111N

    Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Williams, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ. 1111N Financial Network Investment Corporation, Petitioner-Appellant, Luigi Spadafora -against-

  • Nicholas v. State

    Publication Date: 2001-09-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-23
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Leslie Brock Yates Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NOS. 14-00-00312

    AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED AND OPINION FILED AUGUST 23, 2001.OPINIONAppellant, Mitchell Ray Nicholas, pled guilty to three indictments for aggravated sexual assault of a child and three indictments fo

  • March 30, 2012 | The American Lawyer

    Companies Pour Cold Water on Madison County 'Hellhole'

    Is tort reform by judicial decree becoming a nationwide trend? That's the question we were pondering after word came late Thursday that a state court judge in Madison County, Ill

    1 minute read

  • In re Citigroup, Inc. Capital Accumulation Plan Litigation

    Publication Date: 2008-07-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-24
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Lipez, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 06-2565 & 07-1150

    Before Lipez and Howard, Circuit Judges, and Gelp*,*fn1 District Judge.Invoking contract and other state common law claims, appellants Jerrold E. Slutzky and Richa

  • Zavodnick v. Leven

    Publication Date: 2001-05-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-27
    Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
    Judge: Skillman, P.J.A.D.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-3626-99T5

    NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONSubmitted February 27, 2001The issue presented by this appeal is whether the enforcement of a judgment creditor's charging lien