Filter This View

  • United States v. Savage

    Publication Date: 2008-09-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-09-18
    Court: 2nd Cir.
    Judge: Pooler, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-4097-cr

    Argued: January 31, 2008Lavon Savage ("Savage") appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Burns, J.), entered on August 24, 2006, convicting him,

  • Hernandez-Loring v. Universidad Metropolitana

    Publication Date: 2000-12-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-12-01
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-2116

    United States Court of AppealsFor the First CircuitNo. 99-2116 MARIA VIRGINIA HERNANDEZ-LORING, DR.,Plaintiff, Appellant,v.UNIVERSIDAD METROPOLITANA; RENE

  • January 2, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Unpublished Opinions

    STATE COURT CASES ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 01-2-2572 Martinez v. Board of Review et al. , App. Div. (per curiam) (5 pp.) Claimant appeals a d

    1 minute read

  • U.S. Denro Steels Inc. v. Lieck

    Publication Date: 2011-04-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-04-05
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Tracy Christopher Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 14-09-01008-CV

    In The Fourteenth Court of AppealsOPINIONIn this breach-of-contract case, we construe an attorney's contingency-fee agreement with his corporate clients. The attorney sued his clients, allegi

  • EIFS, Inc. v. Morie Company, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2002-10-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2001-05036

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 1616f C/hu AD2d Argued - October 10, 2002 SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P./

  • United States v. Shabazz

    Publication Date: 2009-04-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-04-16
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Ambro, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-2145

    PRECEDENTIALSubmitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) March 24, 2009Before: RENDELL, AMBRO, and JORDAN, Circuit JudgesOPINION OF THE COURTA jury found Bilial Shabazz guilty of one count of

  • MATTER OF ROGER E. BENSON v. ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORPORATION MERIT BOARD

    Publication Date: 2003-05-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: CA 02-02472

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department MATTER OF ROGER E. BENSON, AS PRESIDENT OF NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FEDERATION, AFL-

  • Haney v. Jerry's GM, Ltd.

    Publication Date: 2009-02-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-02-12
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 8
    Judge: David Wellington Chew, Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-07-00183-CV

    OPINIONThis is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing Appellant's premises liability and negligent activity suit. Appellant slipped on ice located in the parking lot of a car dealership where

  • July 13, 2009 | The Associated Press

    Democrats push for probe into Bush policies

    WASHINGTON AP - President Barack Obama has been reluctant to probe Bush-era torture and anti-terrorism policies, but his Democratic allies aren't likely to let the matters rest. "I've

    1 minute read

  • State v. Rodriguez

    Publication Date: 2001-02-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-02-02
    Court: N.J. Super. App. Div.
    Judge: Steinberg, J.A.D.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-6624-98T4

    NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISIONSubmitted: December 13, 2000The sole issue raised by defendant on this appeal is his contention that the motion judge erred in d