Filter This View

  • Nguyen v. City of Cleveland

    Publication Date: 2000-10-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-10-11
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Batchelder, Moore, and Beezer(*), Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edward G. Kramer
    for defendant: Claudette Walcott
    Case Number: 99-3200

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. OPINIONALICE M. BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-Appellant, Pram Nguyen, brought three separate lawsuits again

  • Bosky v. Kroger Texas, L.P.

    Publication Date: 2002-04-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-04-08
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: Patrick E. Higginbotham, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 01-40715

    Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of TexasThis is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment in a slip and fall case. The plaintiff challenges the timeliness of

  • Solis v. United States

    Publication Date: 2001-06-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-06-05
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Rosenn, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 99-5833

    Argued: April 4, 2001Filed: June 5, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTA request by a petitioner under 28 U.S.C. S 2255 for an evidentiary hearing under the District Court's discr etionary power is not

  • DATA-TRACK ACCOUNT SERVICES, INC., v LEE, CURTIS W.

    Publication Date: 2005-04-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 4th Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 514

    SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 514 CA 03-01043 PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., GORSKI,

  • May 9, 2013 | New York Law Journal

    'Faragher' and 'Ellerth': Revisited 12 Years Later

    In 1998 the Supreme Court decided two cases on the same day that changed employment discrimination law and spurred a cottage industry: the redrafting of every employer's handbook then existin

    1 minute read

  • Perez v. Danbury Hospital

    Publication Date: 2003-11-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. Court of Appeals Second Circuit Defendants appeal from a contempt order entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Dorsey, J.). The district

  • United States v. Squibb

    Publication Date: 2008-07-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-17
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-4040

    ARGUED JUNE 11, 2008Before MANION, ROVNER, and TINDER, Circuit Judges.A jury found Marietta Squibb guilty of committing mail and wire fraud, and of conspiring to defraud the United States. The d

  • Matter of Ramos v Ramos

    Publication Date: 2010-07-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 506817

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: July 29, 2010 506817 In the Mat

  • Fallu Productions Inc. v. United States, 06 Civ. 13248

    Publication Date: 2008-02-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-02-13
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Denise Cote
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06 Civ. 13248

    District Judge Denise Cote U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: For Plaintiff: Jay Julien, Esq. New York, NY For

  • Simon v. Kings Plaza Shopping Center of Flatbush Avenue Inc.

    Publication Date: 2004-01-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Kings County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Supreme Court IA Part 32 Justice Lewis The Defendants have petitioned this Court for summary judgment in their favor with respect to all of the Plaintiff's claims, whe