Filter This View

  • March 26, 2008 | New York Law Journal

    Limits on Warrantless Searches Of Body Cavities Are Defined

    ALBANY - Absent exigent circumstances, police must obtain a warrant before removing suspicious objects from the body cavities of suspects, a divided Court of Appeals ruled yesterday. A

    1 minute read

  • Casey Hampleton v. United States

    Publication Date: 2011-01-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-23
    Court: D.C. Ct. App.
    Judge: Fisher, Associate Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-CF-343

    Argued October 19, 2010Before REID and FISHER, Associate Judges, and KING, Senior Judge.After the trial court denied his motions to suppress, a jury convicted appellant Casey Hampleton of three

  • October 19, 2012 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Capitol Report

      This is a status report provided by the New Jersey State Bar Association on recently passed and pending legislation, regulations, gubernatorial nominations and/or appointme

    1 minute read

  • Rae Lamar Wiggins, A/K/A Rae v. Bonnie Boyette

    Publication Date: 2011-02-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-02-15
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Diana Gribbon Motz, Circuit Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-6484

    PUBLISHEDArgued: October 26, 2010Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and Damon J. KEITH, Senior Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by desig

  • Moultrie v. Potter

    Publication Date: 2006-06-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Gabriel Gorenstein
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Magistrate Judge Gorenstein Plaintiff Leroy Nathaniel Moultrie brings this action pro se against his employer, John E

  • United States v. City of Arcata

    Publication Date: 2010-12-17
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-17
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Saundra B. Armstrong, District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Pamela Ann Rymer, Circuit Judge, and Matthew F. Kennelly, District Judge.**
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joel McElvain, Department of Justice, Washington, DC; Christine Noel Kohl, Department of Justice, Washington, DC; and Scott R. McIntosh, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the plaintiff-counter-defendant-appellee and counter-defendants-appellees.
    for defendant: Brad Yamauchi, Minami Tamaki LLP, San Francisco, California; Nancy Diamond, Law Offices of Nancy Diamond, Arcata, California; Michael Sorgen, Law Offices of Michael S. Sorgen, San Francisco, California; and Sheryl Schaffner, City of Eureka, Eureka, California, for the defendants-counter-claimants.
    Case Number: No. 09-16780

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15610UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellee, v. CITY OF ARCATA and

  • Ortiz v. Gomez

    Publication Date: 2006-05-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County
    Judge: Jeffrey Spinner
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    SUFFOLK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Spinner This is an action sounding in equity where

  • June 9, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Bankruptcies

    U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of New Jersey 61 MAIN STREET INC, 61 MAIN STREET, PATERSON; Chap. 11; atty. SCURA, MEALEY & SCURA, LLP; 05/23; BK-03-27428. a/k/a EUR

    1 minute read

  • Rosenblit v. Zimmerman

    Publication Date: 2001-02-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-02-26
    Court: N.J. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Long
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-58/61 SEPTEMBE

    ON APPEAL FROM ON CERTIFICATION TO Appellate Division, Superior CourtChief Justice Poritz PRESIDINGArgued September 25, 2000On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division.This

  • December 28, 1999 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Hospital Not Vicariously Liable on Informed Consent Claim

    A hospital cannot be held vicariously liable for the failure of one of its doctors to obtain informed consent, the Superior Court has held. In a case of first impression, the intermediate ap

    1 minute read