• Judge Donald C. Pogue 1 JANE DOE v. DEER MOUNTAIN DAY CAMP INC., 07 Civ. 5495, Decided 01/13/10" [Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment granted in part; Defendants' motion for summary judgmen

    Publication Date: 2010-01-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Unknown
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No CaseNumber

    Judge Donald C. Pogue 1 JANE DOE v. DEER MOUNTAIN DAY CAMP INC., 07 Civ. 5495, Decided 01/13/10" [Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment granted in part; Defendants' mot

  • United States v. Jeffrey Stein, S1 05 Crim. 0888

    Publication Date: 2006-08-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2006-07-25
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge: Lewis Kaplan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: S1 05 Crim. 0888

    U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Justin S. Weddle Kevin M. Downing Stanley J. Okula, Jr. Margaret Garnett Assistant

  • August 5, 2003 | New York Law Journal

    Rodriguez v. Pataki

    Judge MaasRead the Full-Text OpinionRodriguez v. Pataki - I.

    1 minute read

  • Peavy v. WFAA

    Publication Date: 2000-08-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-07-31
    Court: 5th Cir.
    Judge: POLITZ, JOLLY, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 99-10272

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. RHESA HAWKINS BARKSDALE, Circuit Judge:Primarily at issue is whether the First Amendment shields WFAA-TV, Inc., an

  • Jessop v. State

    Publication Date: 2012-04-20
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-19
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: NO. 03-10-00078-CR

    OPINIONAppellant Raymond Merrill Jessop and nine other members of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS), living at the YFZ (Yearning for Zion) Ranch in

  • September 28, 2001 | The American Lawyer

    2001 Associates Survey: From Latham to Wolf Block

    L| M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | A HR

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Mikos

    Publication Date: 2008-08-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-08-25
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Easterbrook, Chief Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Nos. 06-2375, 06-2376 & 06-2421

    ARGUED AUGUST 16, 2007Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and POSNER and EVANS, Circuit Judges.Medicare does not cover the costs of routine medical procedures. Ronald Mikos, a podiatrist, performed

  • Genereux v. American Beryllia Corp.

    Publication Date: 2009-08-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-07-29
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Lipez, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 07-2676

    Before Torruella, Baldock*fn1, and Lipez, Circuit Judges.Suzanne Genereux, her husband Barry Genereux, and their children brought suit against various manufacturer

  • Mickens v. Taylor

    Publication Date: 2002-03-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-03-27
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge: Justice Scalia.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-9285

    Opinion of the Court535 U. S. ____ (2002)On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fourth CircuitThe question presented in this case is what a defendant must show in

  • People v. Schmitz

    Publication Date: 2012-12-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-12-03
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., and Kamala D. Harris, Attorneys General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Gary W. Schons, Assistant Attorney General, James D. Dutton, Steven T. Oetting, Emily R. Hanks and Theodore M. Cropley, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: William D. Farber, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.

    Case Number: No. S186707

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 13223THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,v.DOUGLAS GEORGE SCHMITZ, Defendant and App