Filter This View

  • Baker v. American Horticulture Supply, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-06-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-06-24
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Chad Biggins, for Appellant.
    for defendant: Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hamilton, Moe Keshavarzi. Arnold, Bleuel, LaRochelle, Mathews & Zirbel, Matthew P. Guasco, for Respondent.
    Case Number: 2d Civil No. B212975

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 8166EDWIN BAKER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AMERICAN HORTICULTURE SUPPLY, INC., Def

  • Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. City of Stockton (A.G. Spanos Construction, Inc.)

    Publication Date: 2010-04-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-01
    Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Respondent: Law Offices of William D. Kopper, William D. Kopper; Kenyon Yeates, Charity Kenyon, J. William Yeates, Keith G. Wagner and Jason R. Flanders for Plaintiffs and Respondents. Brandt-Hawley Law Group and Susan Brandt-Hawley for Planning and Conservation League as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Appellant: Steefel, Levitt &Weiss, Judy V. Davidoff, Michael D. Early, Beth C. Tenney; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Robert J. Stumpf, Jr., Arthur J. Friedman and Karin Dougan Vogel for Real Party in Interest and Appellant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Brisco, Ivester & Bazel, John Briscoe, Lawrence S. Bazel, Christian L. Marsh and Shona L. Armstrong for Real Party in Interest and Appellant A.G. Spanos Construction, Inc. Freeman, D?Aiuto, Pierce, Gurev, Keeling & Wolf, Maxwell M. Freeman, Thomas H. Keeling and Michael L. Gurev for Defendants and Respondents. Remy, Thomas, Moose and Manley and Whitman F. Manley for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Respondents and Real Parties in Interest and Appellants.
    Case Number: No. S159690

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 4079STOCKTON CITIZENS FOR SENSIBLE PLANNING, et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v.CI

  • January 5, 2001 | National Law Journal

    Lawyers, Judges Embarrass Themselves in 2000

    The law advances in ways the best of us cannot envision.During 2000, in the heat of the moment, myriad judges across the land wrung from legal doctrine more than could be expected, and

    1 minute read

  • July 8, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Roman Silberfeld of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi

    If you're a Hollywood lawyer, you represent either the content producers or the studios. Not both. And if there was ever any doubt about which side Roman Silberfeld is on, there isn't any more. On Wed

    1 minute read

  • December 4, 2012 | Litigation Daily

    Ninth Circuit Affirms $320 Million Disney Loss over 'Millionaire' Royalties

    Despite bringing in former solicitor general Seth Waxman to plead its case on appeal, The Walt Disney Company has failed to reverse a jury's finding that it duped the creator of "Who Want

    1 minute read

  • June 1, 2010 |

    Bank Not Liable In Nigerian-Style Email Scam

    Question: When a bank sues to recover an overdraft created by a Nigerian-style email scam, which party has the burden of proof on the question of whether, in the context of s

    1 minute read

  • December 22, 2006 | The Recorder

    Hearsay

    So You Wanna Play Rough?'The only redress that we're going to have is to set these cases for trial. � And we will.'� S.F. Public Defender Jeff Adachi, respondin

    1 minute read

  • April 3, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    Offsetting $325 Million Settlements for Northrop Grumman, Justice Department

    Our least favorite call in basketball is the double technical foul, assessed against players of opposing teams who each are called for penalties on the same play. In this situation, both teams have co

    1 minute read

  • November 11, 2009 | The American Lawyer

    Waiting for Wyeth: Patent Cases Spike in Anticipation of Federal Circuit Ruling

    There's something happening in patent litigation. And it's pretty clear that it has to do with the outcome of Wyeth v. Kappos, which was argued at the Federal Circuit last month. That case will have a

    1 minute read

  • J.C. Trading Ltd. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., DEFAX Case No. D65643 (D.Del. May 31, 2013) Andrews, J. (17 pages).

    Publication Date: 2013-07-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: D65643