Filter This View

  • June 24, 2011 | The American Lawyer

    SEC Convinces Ninth Circuit To Reinstate Gateway Exec Convictions

    The Litigation Daily doesn't read minds, but we're pretty sure that lawyers at the Securities and Exchange Commission were pretty unhappy in 2007 when a href="http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/sectoddben

    1 minute read

  • Robles v. Chalilpoyil

    Publication Date: 2010-01-28
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-01-27
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Respondents: Carcione, Cattermole, Dolinski, Okimoto, Stucky, Ukshini, Markowitz & Carcione and Joseph W. Carcione, Jr., Neal A. Markowitz and Chad E. DeVeaux
    for defendant: Attorney for Defendant and Appellant: Neil L. Shapiro
    Case Number: H033329

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 1272VIRGINIA ROBLES et.al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v.PURUSH CHALILPOYIL, Defenda

  • Melom v. City of Madera (Zelman Retail Partners, Inc.)

    Publication Date: 2010-03-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-03-24
    Court: C.A. 5th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: M. R. Wolfe & Associates, and Mark R. Wolfe for Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Richard K. Denhalter, City Attorney, and J. Brent Richardson, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondent and Defendant. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, and Philip F. Atkins-Pattenson, for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
    Case Number: No. F055024

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 3746PATRICIA MELOM Plaintiff and Appellant, v.CITY OF MADERA, Defendant and Responden

  • Arguelles-Romero v. Superior Court (AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc.)

    Publication Date: 2010-05-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-13
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Chavez & Gertler, Mark A. Chavez and Nance F. Becker; Kemnitzer, Anderson, Barron, Ogilvie & Brewer, Bryan Kemnitzer and Nancy Barron for Petitioners.
    for defendant: No appearance for Respondent. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Sascha Henry; Peter S. Hecker, Anna S. McLean and Craig A. Pinedo for Real Party in Interest.
    Case Number: No. B219178

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 5894ARTURO ARGUELLES-ROMERO et al., Petitioners, v.THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES

  • June 1, 2010 |

    Credit Card Issuer Owes No Duty To Non-Obligor "Cardholder"

    Question: "Does a credit card issuer have to resolve disputes about purchases with the consumer who used the card to buy the goods, or just with the person who obtain

    1 minute read

  • January 20, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Does $900 Million Samsung Settlement Portend End of Sprawling Rambus Chip Litigation?

    Editor's note: Zusha Elinson is a reporter at The Recorder, our sibling publication in California. A longer version of this story appears at The Recor

    1 minute read

  • Tornheim v Blue White Food Prods. Corp

    Publication Date: 2008-11-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2008-03912

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department STEVEN W. FISHER, J.P. ROBERT A. LIFSON JOSEPH COVELLO RUTH C. BALK

  • November 14, 2008 | The American Lawyer

    Justice Reaches $585 Million Antitrust Plea Deal with Computer and Video Screen Makers

    Thomas Barnett, who has announced that he's leaving his post as assistant attorney general for the Justice

    1 minute read

  • June 1, 2010 |

    California Statute Regarding Convenience Checks Not Facially Preempted By Federal Law

    Question: Is section 1748.9 of the Civil Code, which requires certain disclosures to credit card holders who use preprinted "convenience checks," preempted by th

    1 minute read

  • May 10, 2010 | The Recorder

    Monthly Lateral Report

    California lateral partner movements for April 2010 Partne

    1 minute read