• Giles v. California

    Publication Date: 2008-06-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-06-25
    Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For petitioner: Marilyn Burkhardt, Los Angeles.
    for defendant: For respondent: Donald De Nicola, California Attorney General's Office, Los Angeles.

    Case Number: 07-6053

    Cite as 08 C.D.O.S. 7838DWAYNE GILES, PETITIONER v. CALIFORNIA No. 07-6053Supreme Court Of The United States On Writ Of Certiorari To The Supreme Court Of

  • Oikonomos, Incorporated, Stonegate Springs, LLC, Second Realty, LLC, Educare Systems Solutions, Inc., 3399 Route 112, LLC and WDR Assets, LLC, Plaintiffs v. John Claude Bahrenberg, The Brayson Foundation, Ltd., Windwood Meadow, Inc., Lake Grove at Durham, Inc., Henry Clark and Jeffrey Dryfoos and the Maple Valley School, Inc., Defendants, 23124-2009

    Publication Date: 2013-01-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Commercial Division Part 46
    Judge: Justice Emily Pines
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiffs: Joel E. Davidson, Esq., Davidson & Grannum, Orangeburg, NY. Linda U. Margolin, Esq., Bracken, Margolin and Besunder, LLP, Islandia, NY.
    for defendant: Attorney for Defendants and Third Party Plaintiffs Windwood Meadow, and Maple Valley: Peter Mott, Esq., Twomey. Latham, Shea & Kelly, Dublin & Quartararo, LLP, Riverhead, NY. Attorney for Defendants Bahrenburg, The Brayson Foundation, Clark & Dryfoos: David A. Ryan Jr., Esq., Ryan & Ryan. LLC, New Haven, CT.

    Case Number: 23124-2009

    Cite as: Oikonomos v. Bahrenberg, 23124-2009, NYLJ 1202585974962, at *1 (Sup., SUF, Decided January 5, 2013)Justice Emily PinesDeci

  • Golin v. Allenby

    Publication Date: 2010-11-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-30
    Court: C.A. 6th
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiffs and Appellants: LAW OFFICES OF DAVID J. BEAUVAIS, David J. Beauvais
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants and Respondents: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, Susan M. Carson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Susan J. King and Stephanie Wald, Deputy Attorneys General for Defendants and Respondents Clifford B. Allenby, Terri Delgadillo, H. Dean Stiles and Kimberly Belshe OFFICE OF THE COUNTY COUNSEL, Ann Miller Ravel, County Counsel and Neysa A. Fligor, Deputy County Counsel for Defendants and Respondents County of Santa Clara, Santa Clara Board of Supervisors Jamie Buckmaster, Mary Greenwood, Malorie M. Street, Jacqui Duong and Randy Hey BRADLEY, CURLEY, ASIANO, BARRABEE & GALE, Eric Gale for Defendant and Respondent San Andreas Regional Center LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT D. PINSKY, Scott D. Pinsky; OFFICE OF CITY ATTORNEY, Gary M. Baum for Defendants and Respondents City of Palo Alto, Lori Krantzer and City of Palo Alto Police Department HALL HIEATT AND CONNELLY, Julie Gravel-Gavery; SHEUERMAN, MARTINI AND TABARI, Deborah Lee Phillips for Defendant and Respondent Stanford Hospital and Clinics MATHENY SEARS LINKER AND LONG, Melissa D. Bickel and Andrea Christensen for Defendants and Respondents Talla House

    Case Number: No. H032619

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 14871JEFFREY GOLIN et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CLIFFORD B. ALLENBY et al., Defenda

  • United States v. Wright

    Publication Date: 2010-11-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-11-04
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dennis K. Burke, United States Attorney, Christina M. Cabanillas, Appellate Chief, Bruce M. Ferg (on the brief and argued), Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Arizona, for plaintiff-appellee United States of America.
    for defendant: Jon Sands, Federal Public Defender, Heather E. Williams and Brian I. Rademacher (on the brief and argued), Assistant Federal Public Defenders, District of Arizona, for the defendant-appellant Jason A. Wright.

    Case Number: No. 08-10525

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 13968 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JASON A. WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant

  • December 1, 2009 | Legaltech News

    2009 Year In Review

    Editor's Note: Here is our annual summary of all new products announcements that appeared in Law Technology News from January, 2009 through November, 2009. A, B, C 3BVi

    1 minute read

  • March 5, 2007 | Legal Times

    To Miami's Greenberg Traurig, Culture is No Vice

    In the course of a decade, Greenberg Traurig has had the kind of growth usually reserved for businesses that sell oil or iPods. Revenues are up by more than 880 percent from 1996, and in

    1 minute read

  • November 21, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Pro Hac Vice Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2

    Supreme Court of New Jersey Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection have reported to the Supreme Court the names of those pro hac v

    1 minute read

  • USA v. Ghailani, S10 98 Crim. 1023 (LAK)

    Publication Date: 2011-01-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael E. Farbiarz, Harry A. Chernoff, Nicholas Lewin, Sean S. Buckley, Assistant United States Attorneys, Preet Bharara, United States Attorney
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: Peter Enrique Quijano, Michael K. Bachrach

    Case Number: S10 98 Crim. 1023 (LAK)

    Cite as: USA v. Ghailani, S10 98 Crim. 1023 (LAK), NYLJ 1202479057250, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 21, 2011)District Judge Lewis A. Kaplanp class="decided

  • Wright v. Southland Corp.

    Publication Date: 1999-09-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 1999-09-03
    Court: The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
    Judge: TJOFLAT, COX and HULL, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 97-3458

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents a question that has baffled courts and comment

  • USA v. Ghailani, S10 98 Crim. 1023 (LAK)

    Publication Date: 2011-01-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael E. Farbiarz, Harry A. Chernoff, Nicholas Lewin, Sean S. Buckley, Assistant United States Attorneys, Preet Bharara, United States Attorney
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: Peter Enrique Quijano, Michael K. Bachrach

    Case Number: S10 98 Crim. 1023 (LAK)

    Cite as: USA v. Ghailani, S10 98 Crim. 1023 (LAK), NYLJ 1202479057250, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 21, 2011)District Judge Lewis A. Kaplanp class="decided