• May 1, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Big Suits

    In re Black Farmers Discrimination Litigation The U.

    1 minute read

  • Sturdza v. United Arab Emirates

    Publication Date: 2002-03-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-03-08
    Court: D.C.Cir.
    Judge: Tatel, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 00-7279

    As amended March 19, 2002Argued November 9, 2001This case involves a dispute between two architects, one of whom, Elena Sturdza, accuses the other, Angelos Demetriou, of stealing her design for

  • November 13, 2007 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Ineligible Foreign Legal Consultants, Ineligible In-House Counsel and Ineligible Pro Hac Vice Attorneys

    Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection Foreign legal consultants, in-house counsel, and pro hac vice attorneys are subject to the same requirements as licensed members of the New J

    1 minute read

  • November 22, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Successful Bar Candidates

    Listed below are the names of successful candidates from the July 2004 New Jersey Bar Examination. Of the 3,265 candidates who sat for this examination, 3,216 have been mailed their resu

    1 minute read

  • Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona, 07-CV-6304

    Publication Date: 2013-01-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Kenneth Karas
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiffs: Paul Savad, Esq., Susan E. Cooper, Esq., Laura M. Feigenbaum, Esq., Savad Churgin, Attorneys at Law Nanuet, New York. Counsel for Plaintiffs: Roman P. Storzer, Esq., Robert L. Greene, Esq., Storzer & Greene, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C. Counsel for Plaintiffs: John G. Stepanovich, Esq., Lentz, Stepanovich & Bergethon, P.L.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia.
    for defendant: Counsel for Defendants: Joseph L. Clasen, Esq., William J. Kelleher, III, Esq., Samantha L.H. Cassetta, Esq., Robinson & Cole LLP, New York, NY. Counsel for Defendants: Marci A. Hamilton, Esq., The Law Office of Marci Hamilton, Washington Crossing, Pennsylvania.

    Case Number: 07-CV-6304

    Cite as: Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of Pomona, 07-CV-6304, NYLJ 1202584002615, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 4, 2013)Dist

  • September 27, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names

    1 minute read

  • May 26, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    5K All Finishers List

    PHILADELPHIA BAR ASSOCIATION 5K RUN MAY 17, 2009 5K FINISHERS LISTING PLACE DIV/TOT

    1 minute read

  • October 2, 2013 | New Jersey Law Journal

    License Revocation Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(c)

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names

    1 minute read

  • Al-Marri v. Pucciarelli

    Publication Date: 2008-07-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2008-07-15
    Court: 4th Cir.
    Judge: Per curiam.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For appellant: Jonathan Hafetz, Brennan Center for Justice, New York University School of Law, New York.
    for defendant: For appellee: Gregory Garre, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.

    Case Number: 06-7427

    ON REHEARING EN BANCPUBLISHEDArgued: October 31, 2007Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, MOTZ, TRAXLER, KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.Reversed and r

  • In re Digex, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-01-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-12-13
    Court: Del. Ch. Ct.
    Judge: CHANDLER, Chancellor
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: Civil Action No.

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. CHANDLER, Chancellor This is my decision on plaintiffs' motion to preliminarily enjoin the proposed merger between