Filter This View

  • Casey v. Citibank, 5:12-CV-820

    Publication Date: 2013-01-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U. S. District Court, Northern District
    Judge: District Judge David Hurd
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Donald H. Nichols, Esq., E. Michelle Drake, Esq., Kai H. Richter, Esq., Of Counsel, Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN. Matthew C. Helland, Esq., Of Counsel, One Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA. Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Patrick F. Madden, Esq., Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen, Esq., Shanon J. Carson, Esq., of Counsel, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA.
    for defendant: Attorneys for Defendants Citibank, N.A.; CitiMortgage, Inc.; and Citigroup, Inc.: Christopher J. Willis, Esq., Sarah T. Reise, Esq., Stefanie H. Jackman, Esq., Of Counsel, Ballard Spahr, LLP, Atlanta, GA. Attorneys for Defendants Citibank, N.A.; CitiMortgage, Inc.; and Citigroup, Inc.: Mitchell J. Katz, Esq., Teresa M. Bennett, Esq., Of Counsel, Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., Syracuse, NY. Attorneys for Defendants MidFirst Bank, N.A. and FirstInsure, Inc.: David S. Kantrowitz, Esq., John C. Englander, Esq., Matthew G. Lindenbaum, Esq., of Counsel, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA. Attorneys for Defendants MidFirst Bank, N.A. and FirstInsure, Inc.: Edward G. Melvin, Esq., Robert J. Smith, Esq., of Counsel, Costello, Cooney & Fearon, PLLC, Syracuse, NY.
    Case Number: 5:12-CV-820

    Cite as: Casey v. Citibank, 5:12-CV-820, NYLJ 1202583126326, at *1 (NDNY, Decided ry 2, 2013)District Judge David HurdDecided:

  • February 28, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Newsbriefs

    Shoplifting Charge Against Judge Expected to Be Dropped Justice Vincent E. Doyle Jr., who was the administrative judge for the Eighth Judicial District in western New Yor

    1 minute read

  • November 23, 2009 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Largest Firms in Philadelphia

    Rank Firm PrincipalOfficeAttys

    1 minute read

  • December 1, 2009 |

    No Headline

    1 minute read

  • Shemian v. Research in Motion Litd, 11 Civ. 4068 (RJS)

    Publication Date: 2013-04-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Richard J. Sullivan
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Plaintiff is represented: By David A.P. Brower of Brower Piven, New York, N.Y.
    for defendant: Defendants are represented: By Jay B. Kasner, Jessica Anne Barcus, and Scott D. Musoff of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, N.Y.
    Case Number: 11 Civ. 4068 (RJS)

    Cite as: Shemian v. Research in Motion Litd, 11 Civ. 4068 (RJS), NYLJ 1202594511968, at *1 (SDNY, Decided March 28, 2013)District Judge Richard J. Su

  • January 18, 2002 | Law.com

    Defanging the Freedom of Information Act

    The Department of Justice recently changed policy with respect to when govern- ment information will be released under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Abandoning the Clinton administr

    1 minute read

  • February 25, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Lawyers' Convictions For Falsifying Business Documents Overturned

    An appeals panel has reversed the convictions of two prominent foreign attorneys who had been found guilty of conspiracy and 16 counts of falsifying business records. In February 2003,

    1 minute read

  • December 4, 2002 | The Recorder

    Digital Copyright Act Goes Before First Criminal Jury

    The controversial Digital Millennium Copyright Act faced its first criminal jury Tuesday with a federal prosecutor labeling the software at the center of the trial a "burglar tool" while the

    1 minute read

  • April 12, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Salaries Going Up at Ballard Spahr and Flaster Greenberg

    The brief lull in salary increases ended Wednesday as two firms said they are bumping up first-year associate salaries.Cherry-Hill, N.J.-based Flaster Greenberg is raising its starting pay f

    1 minute read

  • August 6, 2010 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Creditor, Counsel Liable for Not Halting Garnishment in Bankruptcy Case

    On April 12, in Bailey v. Davant (In re Bailey) , the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of West Virginia addressed the question of whether a creditor and her counsel could bo

    1 minute read