November 5, 2004 | The American Lawyer

The Firm Reports: From A to F

Adams and ReeseNew Orleans

1 minute read

Technology Licensing Corp. v. Videotek, Inc.

Publication Date: 2008-10-15
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2008-10-10
Court: Fed. Cir.
Judge: Plager, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: For plaintiff-appellant: Timothy Vezeau, Katten Muchin Rosenman, Chicago.
for defendant: For defendant-cross appellant: J. Donald McCarthy, Duane Morris, Los Angeles.
Case Number: Nos. 2007-1441, -1463

Published opinionBefore NEWMAN, PLAGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.This is a patent case. It is not unusual for a patent case on appeal to turn more on a question of law or legal procedure than

Reserve International Liquidity Fund Ltd. v. Caxton Int'l Limited, 09 Civ. 9021

Publication Date: 2010-05-06
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2010-04-28
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Paul Gardephe
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: 09 Civ. 9021

District Judge Paul G. Gardephe U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Intervenor Plaintiff: State Street Bank and Trust Company represented by: David B. Mack,

United States v. Jeffrey Stein, S1 05 Crim. 0888

Publication Date: 2006-06-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2006-06-26
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Lewis Kaplan
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: S1 05 Crim. 0888

U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Marc A. Weinstein Justin S. Weddle Katherine Polk Failla Kevin M. Downing Stanley J. Okul

Reid v. Google, Inc.

Publication Date: 2010-08-05
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2010-08-05
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys: For plaintiff:
for defendant:
Case Number: No. S158965

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 10019BRIAN REID, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant and Respondent.p