Filter This View

  • Rodriguez v. State

    Publication Date: 2011-03-16
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2011-03-16
    Court: Tex. Crim. App.
    Judge: Keasler, J.,
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. AP-75,901

    Keasler, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.OPINIONRosendo Rodriguez, III, was convicted in March 2008 of capital murder.*fn1 Based on the jury's a

  • Medtronic Ave, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-04-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-04-17
    Court: 3rd Cir.
    Judge: Greenberg, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 00-5230

    Argued February 12, 2001Filed: April 17, 2001OPINION OF THE COURTThis matter is before the court on an appeal fr om an order of the district court dated September 30, 1999, denying American C

  • Braunstein v. Arizona Department of Transportation

    Publication Date: 2012-06-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-06-27
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: John W. Sedwick, District Judge, Presiding Before: Procter Hug, Jr., Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Paul S. Gerding, KUTAK ROCK LLP, Scottsdale, Arizona, and Gary Edward Lofland, LOFLAND & ASSOCIATES, Yakima, Washington, for the appellant.
    for defendant: Melissa Alice Parham, Kelly Y. Schwab, Michelle Hibbert Swann, CURTIS GOODWIN SULLIVAN UDALL & SCHWAB PLC, Phoenix, Arizona, and Kiersten A. Murphy, Kevin E. O?Malley, GALLAGHER & KENNEDY, P.A., Phoenix, Arizona, for the appellees.
    Case Number: No. 10-16564 No. 10-17193

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7285 PAUL BRAUNSTEIN, DBA Baseplans USA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT O

  • January 18, 2000 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    Guilty Until Proven Innocent

    For the past year-and-a-half, Hartford criminal lawyer M. Donald Cardwell looked like a man headed for prison. The question wasn't so much whether he'd serve, but how long. Only divine inter

    1 minute read

  • July 3, 2013 | Litigation Daily

    Delaware Court Considers Countrywide Derivative Suit

    When do derivative shareholder claims survive a corporate merger?That was the important question that the Delaware Supreme Court considered Wednesday during oral arguments in a case

    1 minute read

  • February 23, 2005 | National Law Journal

    Group Mentality: Lawyers Are Moving to New Firms En Masse

    As the legal market undergoes a tectonic shift due to law firm megamergers, one of the reverberations is an apparent surge in the number of law firms picking off clusters of attorneys fro

    1 minute read

  • Blaisdell v. Frappiea

    Publication Date: 2013-09-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-09-10
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Dawn Sestito, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause and filed the briefs for the plaintiff-appellant. Mica Doctoroff, UCLA School of Law Ninth Circuit Clinic, Los Angeles, CA, also argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant. With them on the briefs was Katharine S. Mercer, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Los Angeles, CA.
    for defendant: Nicholas D. Acedo, Struck Wieneke & Love, P.L.C., Chandler, Arizona, argued the cause and filed a supplemental brief for the defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Daniel P. Struck, Struck Wieneke & Love, P.L.C, Chandler, Arizona. Jaleh Najafi, Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C, Phoenix, Arizona, filed the original brief for the defendant­appellant. With him on the brief were Eileen Dennis GilBride, Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona, and Daniel P. Struck, Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona.
    Case Number: No. 10-16845

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 10066 RIC

  • Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine v. McDonald's Corporation

    Publication Date: 2010-08-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-08-12
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Richards, Watson & Gershon, Norman A. Dupont, T. Peter Pierce; and Daniel Kinburn for Plaintiff and Appellant. Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Ken Alex, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Dennis A. Ragen, Laura J. Zuckerman and Claudia Polsky, Deputy Attorneys General, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.
    for defendant: Goodwin Procter, Forrest A. Hainline III, Robert B. Bader; Arnold & Porter, Trenton H. Norris and Sarah Esmaili for Defendants and Respondents.
    Case Number: No. B218089

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 10519PHYSICIANS COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE MEDICINE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MCDONALD'S

  • September 30, 2008 | The American Lawyer

    Delaware Judge Rules Against Loral Noteholders

    Vice Chancellor Leo Strine of the Delaware Court of Chancery has issued his opinion in the sprawling case known as In re Loral Space and Communication

    1 minute read

  • NEAL AUERBACH, D.D.S., plf-ap, v. IRV TREGERMAN, D.D.S., def-res

    Publication Date: 2013-05-30
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
    Judge: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, DeGrasse, Freedman, Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 10213N

    10213N. NEAL AUERBACH, D.D.S., plf-ap, v. IRV TREGERMAN, D.D.S., def-res Ira Daniel Tokayer, New York, for ap — Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP, New York (Adam M. Felsenstein of counsel),