Filter This View

  • January 28, 2004 | New York Law Journal

    Martha Stewart's Lawyer Blasts Government as Overzealous

    Attorney Robert Morvillo offered a rousing defense of Martha StewartTuesday, telling a jury she had no motive to lie to investigatorsprobing the reasons why she sold her stock in ImClone Syste

    1 minute read

  • American Golf Corp. v. Colburn

    Publication Date: 2001-12-04
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-11-29
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Don Wittig Senior Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 14-00-01575-CV

    AFFIRMED AND OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 29, 2001.OPINIONThis is an appeal from a declaratory judgment action construing a restrictive covenant regulating the collection of fees charged to homeowners

  • United States v. Roberto Beras

    Publication Date: 2004-02-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    U.S. District Court Southern District of New York Judge Kram Pro se defendant, Roberto Beras, moves this Court, [1] pursua

  • Stoudt v. Byrider

    Publication Date: 2000-09-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-09-08
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: SILER and CLAY, Circuit Judges; STAFFORD, District Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Sylvia M. Antalis
    for defendant: Gary W. Johnson
    Case Number: No. 99-3854

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. OPINIONCLAY, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs James D. Stout and Shirley A. Brown appeal the denial of their motion for c

  • Longaberger Co. v. Kolt

    Publication Date: 2009-11-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-11-16
    Court: 6th Cir.
    Judge: Griffin, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 08-4432

    RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: October 14, 2009Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Judge; GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge; TARNOW, District Judge.a HREF="#D*fn1" N

  • Hammad v. Holder

    Publication Date: 2010-04-22
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-04-22
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Michael P. Karr and Lizbeth A. Galdamez, Law Offices of Michael P. Karr & Associates, Sacramento, California, for petitioner Hammad.
    for defendant: Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Stephen J. Flynn, Senior Litigation Counsel, Karen Y. Stewart, Attorney, and Ari Nazarov, Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Washington, D.C., for respondent United States.
    Case Number: 07-72370

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 4958IVAD MOHAMMED HAMMAD, Petitioner, v.ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General, Respondent./p

  • January 25, 2013 | Connecticut Law Tribune

    EEOC Targets Policies Affecting Disabled Employees

    Employers have long been told how critical it is to apply their policies in a fair and consistent manner, including neutral absence-control and leave policies. They have also been reminded th

    1 minute read

  • Bronx County First Department SUPREME COURT,

    Publication Date: 2012-01-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court:
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Justice Sharon A. M. AaronsDelos Ins. Co. v. Almanzar-Castillo (260720/11)—Motion Granted/extDrive New Jersey Ins.Co. v. Davido (305472/09)&md

  • August 3, 2011 | Daily Business Review

    ADP estimates U.S. companies added 114,000 workers in July

    Companies in the U.S. added 114,000 workers to payrolls in July, according to a private survey. The increase followed a revised 145,000 gain the prior month, according to data from A

    1 minute read

  • City of Austin, Appellant v. Ronnie Esparza, Appellee

    Publication Date: 2012-08-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-08-10
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 3
    Judge: David Puryear, Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 03-10-00472-CV

    C O N C U R R I N G A N D D I S S E N T I N G OPINIONBecause I agree with the majority's resolution of the first issue on appeal, I join that portion of the opinion. However, for the reasons