Search Results

April 11, 2012 | The Legal Intelligencer

License Negotiations Not Privileged, Federal Circuit Rules

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled as a matter of first impression that license negotiations related to reasonable royalties and damages are not privileged. On

1 minute read

November 24, 2003 | National Law Journal

Branch offices

Adams and Reese: New Orleans (107); Birmingham, Ala. (51); Houston (38); Baton Rouge, La. (26); Jackson, Miss. (22); Mobile, Ala. (12); Washington (4)Akerman Senterfitt: Miami (145); O

1 minute read

April 1, 2012 | Legaltech News

How to Create a Professional Video or Webinar Presentation

The use of video conferencing in law firms has grown by 8% since 2009, according to the 2011 technology survey from the International Legal Technology Association. There's little doubt that i

1 minute read

September 3, 2010 | Corporate Counsel

Readers React to Law School Deans' Summer of Love

EDITOR'S NOTE: We received several comments at CorpCounsel.com on our r

1 minute read

April 27, 2006 | Legal Times

U.S. justices focus on RICO, not aliens

By Tony Mauro, Legal Times The Supreme Court appeared sympathetic to pleas by business advocates not to "RICO-ize" all types of business relationships, as Justice Stephen Breyer put it

1 minute read

June 24, 2013 | National Law Journal

Progress For Women at Law Firms Can Be Reversed, Too

Of the many "best" law firms for women compilations, I find the Women in Law Empowerment Forum's annual list one of the meatiest. It's no-nonsense, focusing

1 minute read

Urbino v. Orkin Services of California, Inc.

Publication Date: 2013-08-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Date Filed: 2013-08-13
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, Sidney R. Thomas, and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys: For plaintiff: Kenneth H. Yoon (argued) and Stephanie E. Yasuda, Law Offices of Kenneth H. Yoon, Los Angeles, California; Peter M. Hart and Amber S. Healy, Law Offices of Peter M. Hart, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant (No. 11-56944, 11-57002), Plaintiff-Appellant (12-­55064).
for defendant: Theodore R. Scarborough (argued), Robert N. Hochman, and Tacy F. Flint, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois; John E. Lattin, Fisher & Phillips LLP, Irvine, California; Christopher C. Hoffman, Fisher & Phillips LLP, San Diego, California, for Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees (No. 11-56944, 11-57002), Defendants-Appellees (12-55064).
Case Number: No. 11-56944 No. 11-57002 No. 12-55064

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 8847 JOHN URBINO, for himself and on behalf of other current and former employees, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee,p

October 27, 2003 | Legal Times

Return Engagement

Call it the three-year itch.With just over 14 months left in the Bush administration's first term, the trickle of top administration lawyers heading back to private practice is startin

1 minute read

December 9, 2011 | The American Lawyer

The Churn: Lateral Moves and Promotions in The Am Law 200

Baker & McKenzie has hired two new tax partners. In Chicago, PATRICIA REXFORD brings her tax controversy practice to the firm from Mayer Brown. Rexford represents clients on audits, IRS a

1 minute read

September 25, 2012 | Litigation Daily

Rambus 'Shred Days' Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced

The computer chip designer Rambus Inc. has long been haunted by its decision to shred hundreds of boxes of documents not long before it a target="new" href="http://www.law.com/corporatecouns

1 minute read