Filter This View

  • In the Matter of the Seizure of Weapons Belonging to A.K.

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Family Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division
    Judge: Per Curiam
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: A-2046-20

    Husband appealed the forfeiture of his firearm, ammunition and firearms purchaser identification card under the Prevention of Domestic Violence Act.

  • Andreas v. Cushing

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York
    Judge: Justice Alexander Tisch
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 156486/2016

    Motion to Amend Complaint Denied; Delay in Proposed Changes Prejudices Defendants

  • People v. Maloy

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, Third Department
    Judge: Justice Stan Pritzker
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Respondent: Lisa M. Bondarenka of counsel, Meagan K. Galligan, District Attorney, Monticello.
    for defendant: For Appellant: Jane M. Bloom, Monticello.
    Case Number: 111567

    Panel Affirms Convicted Defendant's Sentence of 130 Years to Life

  • Ex Part Nuncio

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Criminal Appeals
    Judge: Judge Walker
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: PD-0478-19

    The Texas obscene harassment statute was ruled to be constitutional by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

  • Ex Parte Sanders

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Criminal Appeals
    Judge: Judge Walker
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: PD-0469-19

    The Texas telephone harassment statute was ruled to be constitutional by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

  • Ex Parte Barton

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Criminal Appeals
    Judge: Judge Walker
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: PD-1123-19

    The Texas electronic harassment statute was held to be constitutional by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

  • Harris v. City of Newark

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Civil Rights
    Industry:
    Court: New Jersey Supreme Court
    Judge: Justice Patterson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Emilia Perez, Assistant Corporation Counsel (Kenyatta K. Stewart, Corporation Counsel, City of Newark-Department of Law, attorneys; Wilson D. Antoine, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel and on the briefs)
    for defendant: Brooke M. Barnett (BMB Law Firm, attorneys; Brooke M. Barnett, on the briefs)
    Case Number: A-59-20 (085028)

    Denial of Police Officers' Request for Qualified Immunity in State Law Civil Rights Claim Was Not Final Appealable Order

  • Ex Parte Rion

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Constitutional Law | Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Criminal Appeals
    Judge: Judge Walker
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: PD-1096-19

    A criminal defendant, who was found not guilty at trial for crimes related to a traffic accident, failed to prove on appeal that the government lacked the ability pursuant to the collateral estoppel doctrine to charge him for different crimes for the same accident.

  • A & M Hospitalities LLC et al. v. Alimchandani

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
    Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
    Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
    Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: J. Bright, Justin Scott, (Coleman Talley LLP), Valdosta, John Floyd, Jennifer Peterson, Kamal Ghali, (Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore), Atlanta, James Garland, George Lilly, (Alexander & Vann, LLP), Thomasville, John Kennedy, (James-Bates-Brannan-Groover, LLP), Macon, Timothy Tanner, (Attorney at Law), Valdosta, for appellant.
    for defendant: Henry Scott, (H. Pearce Scott, P.C.), Valdosta, Vineet Roney, (Roney Law LLC), Atlanta, Daniel Lombard, David Lakin, Jonathan Bunge, Daniel Scwartz, Sanford Weisburst, (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP), Chicago, New York, K. Cooke, (Gautreaux Law, LLC), Macon, for appellee; Christopher Cohilas, (Watson Spence LLP), Albany, for other party.
    Case Number: A21A1576

    Court determines that a plaintiff's second amended complaint is barred by res judicata

  • Rogers v. Coslett

    Publication Date: 2022-04-18
    Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Procedure | Real Estate
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Justice Morriss
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-21-00047-CV

    A landowner, who claimed that his half-sister should not have obtained summary judgment in a case related to jointly owned property, successfully proved on appeal that there were genuine issues of material fact.