Filter This View

  • Bosscorp Inc. v. Donegal Inc.

    Publication Date: 2012-04-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-04-17
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: Tracy Christopher Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: NO. 14-11-00439-CV

    Affirmed in part and Reversed and Remanded in part and Opinion filed April 17, 2012.In The Fourteenth Court of AppealsOPINIONThis is an appeal from a grant of a motion to

  • August 31, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    Associates Survey 2010: Firms from L to Z

    Purchase the electronic version of the 2

    1 minute read

  • January 22, 2010 | The American Lawyer

    In Vestigial Stent Case, Boston Scientific Wins Summary Judgment against Johnson & Johnson

    Remember when we told you last September about the global deal in which Boston Scientific agreed to pay Johnson & Johnson $716 m

    1 minute read

  • August 22, 2005 | New York Law Journal

    Songwriter Wins Bid To Reacquire Rights To Her Music Catalog

    A Manhattan judge has issued a rare affirmative injunction, requiring a defendant to execute the documents necessary to transfer the rights to a multi-million dollar catalog of copyrighted mus

    1 minute read

  • February 4, 2003 | Legal Times

    Losing Talent to the Federal Bench

    For law firms, it is one of the perils of success. When a key partner leaves for a lifetime appointment to the federal bench, how does a firm make up for the loss?While losing a partne

    1 minute read

  • January 20, 2009 | Legal Times

    SG pick has glaring gap on rsum

    Top-drawer legal practices have been built, enviable careers have been charted, and much ink has been spilt, based on a proposition that is rarely disputed: arguing before the Supreme Court a

    1 minute read

  • May 7, 2009 | Legal Times

    Despite recession, revenue steady in D.C.

    Despite recession, revenue steady in D.C. Eight firms earned less last year, but the top-grossing law offices posted a total of $6.1 billion in gross revenue. div id="c

    1 minute read

  • March 22, 2001 | National Law Journal

    Does One Size Fit All?

    Can an old dog learn new tricks? As the new economy continues to develop -- and falter -- many will be watching to see how the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, drafted when the Internet was barely a twin

    1 minute read

  • November 26, 2012 | National Law Journal

    At host of agencies, battles brewing

    For some federal agencies, President Barack Obama's second term means a second chance. From investor protection to food safety, greenhouse gas limits to new workplace injury prevention progra

    1 minute read

  • In re ATM Fee Antitrust Litigation

    Publication Date: 2012-07-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2012-07-12
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge: Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding Before: Carlos F. Lucero,* Consuelo M. Callahan, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Joseph R. Saveri, Brendan P. Glackin, and Andew S. Kingsdale, Leiff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP, San Francisco, California; Merrill G. Davidoff (argued), Bart D. Cohen, and Michael J. Kane, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for the plaintiffs-appellants.
    for defendant: W. Stephen Smith and Deanne E. Maynard (argued), Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C.; Robert S. Stern and Sylvia Rivera, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Los Angeles, California, for defendant-appellee J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., successor-in-interest to Bank One, N.A. Sonya D. Winner (argued) and Anita F. Stork, Covington & Burling LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Bank of America, N.A. Stephen V. Bomse, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Suntrust Bank, Inc. David F. Graham and Eric H. Grush, Sidley Austin LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for defendants-appellees Citibank, N.A. and Citibank (West), FSB. Jack R. Nelson, Reed Smith LLP, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellee Wachovia Corp. Daniel M. Wall and Joshua N. Holian, Latham & Watkins, San Francisco, California, and Donald I. Baker, Baker & Miller, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Servus Financial Corp. Peter E. Moll and Brian D. Wallach, Cadwalader, Wickcersham & Taft LLP, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellees Concord EFS, Inc. and First Data Corp.
    Case Number: No. 10-17354

    Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 7847 In re: ATM FEE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, PAMELA BRENNAN; TERRY CRAYTON; DARLA MARTINEZ, Plaintiffs-Appel