Filter This View

  • Northside Equities Inc. v. Hulsey

    Publication Date: 2002-08-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court
    Judge: Benham, Robert
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: H. Lehman Franklin Jr., Statesboro, Brent J. Savage and Christopher D. Britt Savage, Turner, Pinson & Karsman, Savannah, for appellant.
    for defendant: Charles B. Tanksley Browning & Tanksley, Marietta, for appellee. Amicus Appellant: Christopher T. Terrell Stokes & Murphy PC, College Park, Irwin W. Stolz Jr. and John J. Barrow Winburn, Lewis, Barrow & Stolz PC, Athens.
    Case Number: S01G1307

    Scientific evidence of a driver's blood alcohol level can create a factual question as to whether the driver was noticeably intoxi

  • Kasky v. Nike, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2002-05-02
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-05-02
    Court: Cal.Sup.Ct.
    Judge: KENNARD, J., GEORGE, C.J., WERDEGAR, J., MORENO, J.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. S087859

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. Acting on behalf of the public, plaintiff brought this action seeking monetary and injunctive relief under Cali

  • Licker v. Harkleroad

    Publication Date: 2002-01-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Pope, Marion T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey H. Schneider Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Zaleon PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . David H. Flint, Lynn C. Stewart Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, Atlanta, and Gerald Davidson Jr. Anderson, Davidson & Tate, Lawrenceville, for appellees.
    Case Number: A01A1221

    Amendments to a subdivision's restrictive covenants which allowed for the commercial use of less than all of the lots were invalid without the consent of the adversely affected property owners beca

  • Licker v. Harkleroad

    Publication Date: 2001-12-07
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Pope, Marion T.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Jeffrey H. Schneider Weissman, Nowack, Curry & Zaleon PC, Atlanta, for appellant.
    for defendant: . David H. Flint, Lynn C. Stewart Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, Atlanta, and Gerald Davidson Jr. Anderson, Davidson & Tate, Lawrenceville, for appellees.
    Case Number: A01A1221

    Amendments to a subdivision's restrictive covenants which allowed for the commercial use of less than all of the lots were invalid without the consent of the adversely affected property owners beca

  • October 2, 2001 | Texas Lawyer

    Bookmarks: What Web Sites Are Other Legal Professionals Using?

    What Web sites can other legal professionals not live without? Texas Lawyer takes a peek at the bookmarks of Tom Mayo, Associate Professor at Southern Methodist University Dedman School of La

    1 minute read

  • Bonar v. Bonar

    Publication Date: 2000-10-27
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Court of Appeals
    Judge: Johnson, Edward H.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Howard S. McKelvey Jr. McKelvey & Calhoun PC, Americus, for appellant.
    for defendant: Jesse G. Bowles III Bowles & Bowles, Cuthbert, for appellee.
    Case Number: A00A1739

    Trial court lacked jurisdiction to modify a Louisiana child custody order because the Louisiana court retained jurisdiction to resolve any future custody dis

  • September 30, 2002 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection List of Ineligible Attorneys

    The Supreme Court has entered an Order declaring in le to practice law in New Jersey those attorneys not in compliance with the 2002 annual assessment. That Order and the list of in

    1 minute read

  • September 26, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a)

    SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund) have reported to the Supreme Court the names of those attorneys

    1 minute read

  • September 24, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

    2010 Ineligible List

    Attorney Ineligibility Order Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2(a) SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY Pursuant to Rule 1:28-2, the Trustees of the New Jersey Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection (Fund)

    1 minute read

  • October 31, 2011 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Ineligible In-House Counsel, Multijurisdictional Practitioners and Pro Hac Vice Attorneys

    Pro hac vice attorneys, in-house counsel, and multijurisdictional practitioners attorneys are subject to the same requirements as licensed members of the New Jersey Bar under a number of Court Rule

    1 minute read