Filter This View

  • Julio Pina, Plaintiff v. Dora Homes, Inc., Maguire Avenue Realty Corp. and Ovas Building Corp., Defendants, 09-CV-1626

    Publication Date: 2013-02-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge Frederic Block
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Julio Pina: Richard M. Winograd, Esq., Stuart L. Kitchner, Esq., Thailary Lim, Esq., Ginarte, O'Dwyer, Gonzalez, Gallardo & Winograd, LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Dora Homes, Inc., Maguire Avenue Realty Corp. and Ovas Building Corp.: Howard M. File, Esq., Staten Island, NY. For Choray Construction Corp. and Oscar Abad: Leigh Harris Sutton, Esq. Athanasia Apostolakos, Esq. Morris Duffy Alonso & Faley, New York, NY.
    Case Number: 09-CV-1626

    Cite as: Pina v. Dora Homes, Inc., 09-CV-1626, NYLJ 1202586871348, at *1 (EDNY, Decided January 29, 2013)District Judge Frederic Bl

  • September 26, 2007 | Legal Times

    Supreme Court to Examine Lethal Injection, Voter Identification

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday set the stage for a full-scale examination of whether execution by lethal injection violates the Eighth Amendment's bar against "cruel and unusual" punishment. T

    1 minute read

  • Matter of Jones

    Publication Date: 2010-05-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: M4261 M5312

    Angela M. Mazzarelli,Justice Presiding, Richard T. Andrias David B. Saxe James M. Catterson Rolando T. Acosta, Justices. M-4261 M-5312 In the Matter of Janeen S. Jones, (admitted as

  • DeCrescenzo v Gonzalez

    Publication Date: 2007-12-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Appellate Division, 2nd Dept
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 2006-05823

    Supreme Court of the State of New York Appellate Division: Second Judicial Department A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J. WILLIAM F. MASTRO FRED T. SANTUCCI ROBERT A.

  • June 27, 2003 | The American Lawyer

    Mining Cornwall

    Surfers hanging ten aren't the first image you associate with Great Britain. Nor are sunny beaches, barking seals, or orange mascarpone ice cream. But quirky Cornwall, five hours southwest of

    1 minute read

  • Kensington Manufacturing Co. v. Worker's Compensation Appeal Board

    Publication Date: 2001-07-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-17
    Court: Pa. Commw. Ct.
    Judge: Judge Leadbetter
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 1413 C.D. 2000

    SUBMITTED: September 29, 2000Kensington Manufacturing Company (employer) and its workers' compensation insurance carrier, The PMA Group (PMA), appeal from an order of the Workers' Compensation Appe

  • December 16, 2003 | National Law Journal

    Milberg's Breakup Isn't a Quickie

    The painstaking process of breaking up the giant plaintiffs' law firm Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach is taking several months longer than expected due to a number of complications, s

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Gallo-Moreno

    Publication Date: 2009-10-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-10-19
    Court: 7th Cir.
    Judge: Sykes, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 06-1696

    ARGUED NOVEMBER 3, 2008Before KANNE, EVANS, and SYKES, Circuit Judges.In 1994 Fernando Carrion was indicted for his involvement in a large-scale drug conspiracy in Chicago, and a warrant was iss

  • February 18, 2002 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Judicial Profile: Judge Donald Collester Jr.

    Appointed: 1997.Born: New York City, Oct. 20, 1939.Law Degree: Harvard University Law

    1 minute read

  • Maitland v. University of Minn.

    Publication Date: 2001-09-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-08-15
    Court: 8th Cir.
    Judge: WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MAGILL, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 00-2192

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. This case is making its third appearance in this Court, having been twicedismissed and revived on appeal. In this lat