Filter This View

  • Wilson Almonte and Belkis Almonte, Plaintiffs v. Cauldwell-Wingate Company, LLC, Defendant, 110365/2010

    Publication Date: 2012-11-05
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County, Part 46
    Judge: Justice Lucy Billings
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff: Jessica L. Rothman Esq., Ingram Yuzek Gainen Carroll & Bertolotti, LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Third Party Defendants ASM Mechanical Systems and AABCO Sheet Metal Co., Inc.: Debbie-Ann Morley Esq. Safranek, Cohen & Krolian, White Plains, NY. For Third Party Defendant Bradshaw Mechanical Co., Inc.: Peter M. Canty Esq., Conway, Farrell, Curtin & Kelly, P.C., New York, NY.
    Case Number: 110365/2010

    Cite as: Almonte v. Cauldwell-Wingate Company, LLC, 110365/2010, NYLJ 1202577242706, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided October 5, 2012)Justice Lucy Billingsp

  • November 6, 2007 | National Law Journal

    Foreign executives feeling the strain of DOJ's antitrust crackdow

    THE GOVERNMENT'S intensified focus on international cartel prosecutions has led to an unprecedented number of jail sentences, a steadily climbing number of guilty pleas and record prison sent

    1 minute read

  • November 22, 2005 | The Recorder

    Question 2

    Real Property Developer acquired a large tract of undeveloped land, subdivided the tract into 10 lots, and advertised the lots for sale as "Secure, Gated Luxury Home Sites.

    1 minute read

  • International Sales & Service, Inc. v. Austral Insulated Products, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2001-08-09
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-07-30
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: No. 99-12939

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. MAGILL, Circuit Judge:International Sales & Service, Inc. ("ISS") sued Austral Insulated Products, Inc. ("Aust

  • People v. Nesbitt

    Publication Date: 2010-12-23
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-12-22
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Pamela C. Hamanaka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Scott A. Taryle, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Douglas L. Wilson, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    for defendant: Mark D. Lenenberg, under the appointment of the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. B218373

    Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 15943THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL PHILLIP NESBITT, Defendant and Appell

  • May 8, 2012 | Daily Report Online

    Attorney-mediators need to check for conflicts

    Increasingly, attorneys and law firms are looking to different ways of generating income. Seasoned attorneys (and by affil their law firms) looking for diversification often start a med

    1 minute read

  • United States v. Knight

    Publication Date: 2009-04-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-03-25
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: Pryor, Circuit Judge
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 08-10050 & 08-10054

    PUBLISHBefore BARKETT, PRYOR and FARRIS,*fn1 Circuit Judges.The main issue in this appeal is whether a violation of the speedy trial clause of the Interstate Ag

  • July 23, 2007 |

    Some Holds Barred

    The new beefed-up regulation of lawyer advertising in New York calls a quick halt to no-holds-barred lawyer marketing models that have lately become commonplace. Ultimately it will have to be teste

    1 minute read

  • Zaccagnino v. Village of Rye Brook

    Publication Date: 2004-04-29
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Westchester County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    Supreme Court Justice Lefkowitz It is ORDERED that the motion is granted provided that plaintiffs post an undertaking in the amount of $10,000, cash or bond, within twenty day

  • Matter of the Board of Education of the City of New York

    Publication Date: 2005-03-11
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number:

    NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Acosta The petition for a judgment pursuant to Article 75 of the C.P.L.R. is denied and respondent's cross-motion is granted to