Filter This View

  • Schaefer v. American Manufacturers Mutual

    Publication Date: 2002-01-14
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2002-01-10
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
    Judge: Don Burgess Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 09-01-024 CV

    OPINIONGary Schaefer filed a class action suit, on behalf of himself and as representative of all persons similarly situated, complaining of American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company (AMM), K

  • July 21, 2006 | Daily Report Online

    Was Hilfiger deal custom-tailored

    DID TOMMY HILFIGER Corp. get special treatment when it negotiated a nonprosecution agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice last summer The question has recently come to light as the now

    1 minute read

  • Wells Fargo Bank v. Ruggiero, 19322/07

    Publication Date: 2013-06-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, Bronx County
    Judge: Justice Yvonne Lewis
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 19322/07

    Cite as: Wells Fargo Bank v. Ruggiero, 19322/07, NYLJ 1202603029586, at *1 (Sup. BX, Decided May 29, 2013)19322/07Justice Yvonne Lewisp class=

  • Strauss, Inc. v. East 149th Realty Corp., No. 162

    Publication Date: 2012-10-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: New York State Court of Appeals
    Judge: Opinion by Judge Jones. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith and Pigott concur.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Barry A. Cozier, for respondent.
    for defendant: Scott T. Horn, for appellants.
    Case Number: No. 162

    Cite as: Strauss, Inc. v. East 149th Realty Corp., No. 162, NYLJ 1202575989299, at *1 (Ct. of App., Decided October 23, 2012)Opinion by Jones. Chief

  • In re Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc.

    Publication Date: 2010-01-06
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-01-05
    Court: Tex. App. Dist. 14
    Judge: William J. Boyce Justice
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: Nos. 14-09-00202-CV & 14-09-00107-CV

    Petition for Writ of Mandamus Conditionally Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Opinion filed January 5, 2010.ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUSOPINIONThis is an interlocutory appeal (Cause Numbe

  • Moore v. Candlewood Holdings Inc., 07-cv-4878, Decided: May 26, 2010

    Publication Date: 2010-06-03
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District
    Judge: Arthur Spatt
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:
    Case Number: 07-cv-4878, Decided: May 26, 2010

    District Judge Arthur D. Spatt U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: Attorneys for the plaintiff: By: Eric H. Gruber, Esq., of Counsel, Co

  • Nokia Corporation v. InterDigital, Inc., 0-1358-cv

    Publication Date: 2011-05-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Walker, B.D. Parker and Hall, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Patrick J. Flinn (Thomas J. Parker, Janice A. Christensen, on the brief), Alston & Bird LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
    for defendant: Gideon A. Schor (Joshua A. Plaut, on the brief), Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellants.
    Case Number: 0-1358-cv

    Cite as: Nokia Corporation v. InterDigital, Inc., 10-1358-cv, NYLJ 1202494895345, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 23, 2011)Before: Walker, B.D. Parker and Hal

  • July 1, 1999 | National Law Journal

    Women: Lonely at Top

    In 1970, when Candace Krugman Beinecke graduated from Rutgers law school, she could count the number of her female classmates on one hand.In 1975, when Mary B. Cranston graduated from Stanfo

    1 minute read

  • March 8, 2007 | The Legal Intelligencer

    Trial Looming in Case Between Equal, Splenda

    In a court battle between the makers of the nation's leading sugar substitutes � Equal and Splenda � a federal judge has ruled that a jury must decide whether Splenda is misleading consumers b

    1 minute read

  • In re Gloria A.

    Publication Date: 2013-02-01
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2013-01-31
    Court: C.A. 2nd
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: John F. Krattli, County Counsel, James M. Owens, Assistant County Counsel, William D. Thetford, Principal Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services. Linda J. Vogel, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Respondent Gloria A.
    for defendant: Janice A. Jenkins, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    Case Number: No. B239465

    Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 1258 In re GLORIA A., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN