• Virginia Properties v. T-Mobile, 16‐2973

    Publication Date: 2017-08-02
    Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Constitutional Law
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom | Construction
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Calabresi, Pooler, C.JJ., and Vilardo, D.J.1
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff‐Appellant Virginia Properties, LLC: Seth L. Levine, Christos G. Papapetrou, on the brief, Kenneth E. Lee, Levine Lee LLP, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendant‐Appellee T‐Mobile Northeast LLC: Darren W. Johnson, on the brief, Roberta Kaplan, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY. Also on the brief: Daniel C. Folchetti, Law Office of Lori D. Fishman, Tarrytown, NY, for Third‐Party Defendants‐ Cross‐Defendants‐Cross‐Claimants‐Appellees Innovative Engineering, Inc.; Patrick W. Brophy, McMahon, Martine & Gallagher, LLP, Brooklyn, NY, for Third‐Party Defendants‐Cross‐Defendants‐Cross‐Claimants‐Appellees Skyline Steel Fabricators & Erectors, Inc. For Appellee KMB Design Group, LLC: Joyce E. Boyle, McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney & Carpenter, LLP, New York, NY.

    Case Number: 16‐2973

    Second Circuit Junks $700K Sanctions Order Against Pla

  • August 1, 2017 |

    Progressive Casualty Ins. Co. v. Monaco

    Click Here for FC&S Expert Legal AnalysisProgressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. MonacoUnited States District Court for the District of ConnecticutJuly 5, 2017,…

    1 minute read

  • USA v. Huertas, 15-4014

    Publication Date: 2017-07-31
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Winter, Jacobs, and Pooler, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Appellee: with Marc H. Silverman, on the brief, Alina P. Reynolds, for Deirdre M. Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, New Haven, CT.
    for defendant: For Defendant-Appellant: Jennifer Mellon, for Terence S. Ward, Federal Defender, District of Connecticut, New Haven, CT.

    Case Number: 15-4014

    Suppression's Denial Upheld; Defendant Never Submitted to Police Authority, Was Never

  • Specrite Design, LLC v. Elli N.Y. Design Corp., 16 Civ. 6154

    Publication Date: 2017-07-26
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Edgardo Ramos
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 16 Civ. 6154

    Lien Foreclosure, Bond Recovery Case Stayed Pending Outcome of State Court Breach

  • July 24, 2017 |

    Durham v. Metro. Group Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.

    Click Here for FC&S Expert Legal AnalysisDurham v. Metro. Grp. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co.United States District Court for the District of ConnecticutJuly…

    1 minute read

  • Washington v. Ilund, 15-cv-1162

    Publication Date: 2017-07-21
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
    Judge: District Judge LeShann DeArcy Hall
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 15-cv-1162

    Officers Unaware Plaintiff Lived at Home When They Went in Search of Coplaintiff's

  • July 19, 2017 | New York Law Journal

    Forgetting Our Internet Woes

    Bill Moran writes: The First Amendment details bedrock principles in the United States that counter the "right to be forgotten" movement proceeding in Europe and elsewhere. But a debate is needed over where to find the proper balance between our inherent privacy rights concerning at least some of our personal online data on the one hand, and the constitutional rights to freedom of speech and freedom of the press on the other. A more focused approach might strike the balance and thereby advance a foundation for Internet privacy regulation.

    1 minute read

  • Pasternack v. Shrader, 16-217

    Publication Date: 2017-07-19
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Judge: Before: Winter, Jacobs, and Pooler, C.JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant Bruce Pasternack: Jared R. Clark on the brief, Mark M. Elliott, Phillips Nizer LLP, New York, NY. For Plaintiff-Appellant Reginald Boudinot: Michael Q. English, Finn Dixon & Herling LLP, Stamford, CT. For Consolidated-Plaintiffs-Appellants Reginald Boudinot and Paul Kocourek: Mark Kelly, Kelly & Hazen, New York, NY.
    for defendant: For Defendants-Counter Claimants-Appellees: Everett C. Johnson, Jr., J. Christian Word, Sarah A. Greenfield, and Jonathan Y. Ellis on the brief, J. Scott Ballenger Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC.

    Case Number: 16-217

    ERISA Claims' Dismissal Upheld; Consultancy's Stock Rights Plan Not an Employee Pensio

  • TCR Sports v. WN Partner, 652044/14

    Publication Date: 2017-07-18
    Practice Area: Telecommunications | Civil Appeals
    Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
    Court: Appellate Division, First Department
    Judge: Before: Acosta, P.J., Richter, Andrias, Kahn, Gesmer, JJ.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For TCR Sports Broadcasting Holding, LLP, appellant-respondent/respondent: Thomas J. Hall of counsel, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, New York, and Rachel W. Thorn, Alan Levine and Caroline Pignatelli of counsel, Cooley LLP, New York. For TCR Sports Broadcasting Holding, LLP, the Baltimore Orioles Baseball Club and the Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership, appellants-respondents/respondents: Carter G. Phillips of the bar of the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC.
    for defendant: For the Baltimore Orioles Baseball Club and the Baltimore Orioles Limited Partnership, appellants-respondents/respondents: Benjamin R. Nagin, Eamon P. Joyce, Kwaku A. Akowuah and Tobias S. Loss-Eaton of counsel, Sidley Austin LLP, New York. For Washington Nationals Baseball Club, LLC, respondent-appellant/respondent: Stephen R. Neuwirth, Sanford I. Weisburst, Julia J. Peck and Cleland B. Welton II of counsel, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York. For the Office of Commissioner of Baseball and the Commissioner of Major League Baseball, respondents-appellants: Paul Clement of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice, Erin E. Murphy of the bar of the District of Columbia and the State of Virginia, admitted pro hac vice, and Michael H. McGinley of the bar of the District of Columbia, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, John J. Buckley, Jr. of counsel, Williams & Connolly, New York, and Jonathan D. Lupkin of counsel, Lupkin and Associates, New York. For E. Leo Milonas, amicus curiae: David G. Keyko of counsel, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, New York. For Diamond Dealers Club, Inc., amicus curiae: Stephen L. Ascher, Irene M. Ten Cate and Jeremy H. Ershow of counsel, Jenner Block LLP, New York. For Kenneth R. Feinberg, amicus curiae: Lawrence I. Ginsburg, Jay R. Fialkoff and Robert B. McFarlane of counsel, Moses & Singer LLP, New York. For Robert S. Smith, amicus curiae: Robert S. Smith, Robert J. Lack and Nora Bojar of counsel, Friedman Kaplan Seiler and Adelman, New York.

    Case Number: 652044/14

    Panel's Close Call on MLB-Network Dispute May Set Up Extra Legal I

  • Gust, Inc. v. Alphacap Ventures, LLC, 15cv6192

    Publication Date: 2017-07-18
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
    Judge: District Judge Denise Cote
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: For Gust, Inc.: Frank A. Bruno, White and Williams LLP, Philadelphia, PA.
    for defendant: For Alpha Cap Ventures, LLC and Richard Juarez: Marie A. McCrary, Gutride Safier LLP, San Francisco, CA.

    Case Number: 15cv6192

    Ruling Holding Counsel Liable For Multiplying Proceedings in Patent Case Not Recons