• Chanda v. Engelhard/ICC.

    Publication Date: 2000-12-13
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2000-12-04
    Court: 11th Cir.
    Judge: FJOFLAT, HILL, and POLITZ; Circuit Judges
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: No. 99-13917

    The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. POLITZ, Circuit Judge:Ishaq I. Chanda appeals an adverse grant of summary judgment. The trial court found that he

  • March 21, 2012 | New York Law Journal

    Do Novel Document Review Methods Demand Disclosure?

    Before the advent of large-scale e-discovery, lawyers had no need to disclose how they planned to review documents for responsiveness and privilege. Everyone knew there was only one way to do

    1 minute read

  • Jiang v. Holder

    Publication Date: 2010-05-24
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2010-05-24
    Court: 9th Cir.
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff: Helen A. Sklar, Stone & Grzegorek LLP, Los Angeles, California, and Alphan K. Tsoi, Tsoi & Associates, Monterey Park, California, for the petitioner.
    for defendant: Jessica Segall, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia, for the respondent.

    Case Number: 08-73186

    !-- .indented { padding-left: 40pt; padding-right: 40pt; } -- Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 6307hr size="1" width="50%" color="black" align="le

  • June 12, 2001 | Law.com

    Opinion of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 'Cadence Design Systems, Inc. v. Avant! Corporation'

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUITCADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS, a Delaware corporation,Plaintiff-Appellant,v.AVANT! CORPORATION, formerlyARCSYS,

    1 minute read

  • October 3, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

    Kanter v. Barella, et al.

    U.S. District Court BUSINESS LAW � Corporations � Shareholder Derivative Actions Kanter v. Barella, et al. Civil No. 04-5542; United States District Court (DNJ

    1 minute read

  • GBI Acupuncture, P.C. v. Esurance Ins. Co.

    Publication Date: 2013-02-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Civil Court, Kings County, Part
    Judge: Judge Harriet Thompson
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 126179/09

    Cite as: GBI Acupuncture, P.C. v. Esurance Ins. Co., 126179/09, NYLJ 1202589482017, at *1 (Civ., KI, Decided)Judge Harriet ThompsonRecitation, as r

  • Liberty Theaters Inc. v. Local 91 Realty Corp.

    Publication Date: 2004-03-10
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge:
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number:

    Supreme Court IA Part 54 Justice Kornreich In May 1994, defendant Local 91 Realty Corporation ("defendant," "Local 91" "owner" or "landlord") leased a portion of its p

  • Gross v. Empire Healthchoice Assurance Inc., 602848-05

    Publication Date: 2006-06-15
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Court: Supreme Court, New York County
    Judge: Bernard Fried
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 602848-05

    NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Counsel for Plaintiffs: Jeffrey M. Gross, M.D. et al. Meiselman, Denlea, Packman, Carton & Eberz P.C. (Jill Owens, Barry Cep

  • United States v. Roach

    Publication Date: 2009-09-25
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2009-09-21
    Court: 10th Cir.
    Judge: Lucero, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 08-3029

    PUBLISHBefore LUCERO, EBEL, and TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judges.Manuel A. Roach was a long-time member of the Northside Crips, a Wichita, Kansas, street gang. Years after his last documented involveme

  • Central Maine Power Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

    Publication Date: 2001-06-12
    Practice Area:
    Industry:
    Date Filed: 2001-06-08
    Court: 1st Cir.
    Judge: Boudin, Circuit Judge.
    Attorneys: For plaintiff:
    for defendant:

    Case Number: 01-1376,, No. 01

    ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF ORDERS OF THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSIONThe petitions for review in this case challenge orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") that have the